tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4812887797823417098.post500549726007854917..comments2023-10-10T22:21:55.411+08:00Comments on Malaysians Unplugged Uncensored: A Legal Analysis on Why the Perak Sultan Got It ALL Wrong in Law by Sacking the Menteri BesarUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4812887797823417098.post-28039965110229794452009-02-06T23:56:00.000+08:002009-02-06T23:56:00.000+08:00Nobody seems to want to say it but is it a race th...Nobody seems to want to say it but is it a race thing. ? I think the issues arising from this debate have all been exhausted, and all angles covered; however, we need to discuss the fairness of the Sultan in differing to the BN and giving the 2 fingers to Pakatan. Both the BN and Pakatan have 28 MPs on each side, and if nothing comes in between these two parties, then fairness calls for dissolution of Parliament and an election to be called, but here we have the problem of the 3 Pakatan jumping frogs to complicate matters.<BR/><BR/>I believe, in dealing with these 3 opportunists, the Sultan should have injected a dose of common sense into his deliberation. The problem with Sultan Azlan Shah is that he was biased, and he did not show any common sense at all in his deliberations. As Ruler of his people, Sultan ought to have been more caring and if he were protective of the interests of his people, then he should have taken all the circumstances into consideration. He should have taken into consideration the criminal charges that have already been laid by the ACA against these 2 Pakatan MPs and that prosecutions are afoot. Does he not in these circumstances, put foremost in his considerations the fact that these 2 PKR MPs have been charged with corruption and bearing in mind that in the event of their conviction their seats will as a matter of course be declared vacant and that a by election will have to be called anyway.<BR/><BR/>On the issue of his dealing in the affairs of those two Pakatan “cross overs” if Sultan Azlan Shah had any common sense then he should have given some weight to the prospect of a conviction for those two suspects and hence given the benefit of the doubt in favour of Pakatan, because in the first case the character of these two accused persons are not too kosher ! and secondly, he should have given more serious consideration that the corruption charges are more likely than not true and likely to convict the two accuseds. That being the case Sultan Azlan Shah in fact should have approved the request of the MB for dissolution.<BR/><BR/>Unfortunately in Malaysia Judges do not have any respect for the sanctity of the LAW and in many cases Judges DO WHATEVER THEY LIKED WITHOUT ANY CONSIDERATION FOR THE LAW; very often their ignorance of the LAW caused them to act in ways that made them (judges) commit offences in breach of the Malaysian Penal Code. It is laughable that High Court Judges can be so illiterate of the Law that they out of sheer ignorance incriminate themselves from sheer ignorance of the law. I am speaking from my own case that has been running for the last 9 years and the BABE IN THE WOODS JUDGE” committed among others aiding & abetting perjury & forgery and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and several other criminal offences. Therefore it is not surprising to me at all that the Sultan is accountable for lapse of common sense in the execution of his duty in this crisis.Yap Chong Yeehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01049964149247000909noreply@blogger.com