tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4812887797823417098.post6735714201028025369..comments2023-10-10T22:21:55.411+08:00Comments on Malaysians Unplugged Uncensored: Judicial Commissioner RIDWAN IBRAHIM Should be SACKED or DEMOTED for Incompetence and an Embarrassment to the JudiciaryUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4812887797823417098.post-69780860066760931572009-03-19T19:06:00.000+08:002009-03-19T19:06:00.000+08:00It is dangerous to let men of this ilk sit on the ...It is dangerous to let men of this ilk sit on the Bench and make judgment on our fellow men and women. <BR/>Is this what BN has finally brought this country to. <BR/><BR/>Having persons who are illetarate perhaps serves the interests of UMNO best. Here lies the answer as to who our Judiciary stands in utter ridicule.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16199874542968822142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4812887797823417098.post-46745967552294013242009-03-15T08:23:00.000+08:002009-03-15T08:23:00.000+08:00To Editor of Malaysians unplugged,Re : Comments to...To <BR/>Editor of Malaysians unplugged,<BR/><BR/>Re : Comments to artice on the dismal performance of J Commissioner Ridswan.<BR/><BR/>My comments that are stated here will also be the same one that I will fax to 46 Judges, Prosecutors and anti-corruption senior officers.<BR/><BR/>If J. Commissioner Ridswan can be sacked for such obvious lack of knowledge of the law as a judge then will this call for the sacking of any such similar cases of judges who have demonstrated a similar gross lack of learning of the law be also sacked for the same reason ?<BR/><BR/>It does not take an Einstein to appreciate that a judge of any high court of any nation has to be a person who is well versed in the law and that only such learned lawyer deserves to serve at the highest level of the judiciary. In Malaysia, judges who have just a mere and very elementary knowledge of the law do get appointed to the bench at the highest level and in most of these cases, it is more acceptable to their ego to be known to be corrupt than to be discovered to be fools on the bench. It is not too difficult to understand why cases in our courts take on an average 10 years to 15 years to end and in most of the cases there is found to be miscarriage of justice and the law. THERE IS NO JUSTICE IF THE LAW IS MISAPPLIED !<BR/><BR/>Judges upon appointment to the bench TAKE AN OATH of office and affirm that they shall carry out the enforcement of the law without fear or favour; and by the oath if they are discovered to be acting with intention to pervert the course of the law, then by their oath they must be found to be in breach and therefore must by law be dismissed ! Why has the contract of this errant judge been extended ? Do the oath of a judge to observe and enforce the law not mean anything to the Chief Justice ? This is what the state of the law has become, even the Chief Justice can aid and abet the abuse of power of one of his judges and be rewarded for acting with obvious disrespect for the law and to serve both a narrow and partisan interests. This is not an honest to goodness administration of the law; this is in fact a joke !<BR/><BR/>I too have the misfortune to be the victim of another errant judge of the High Court of Malaysia and now she sits on the bench of the Court of Appeal; her name is Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali of the Court of Appeal. She too like this judge Ridsawn, had disrespected the law and abused her powers as a judge.<BR/><BR/>She approved to the respondents of my wife’s Originating Petition No. D2-26-41 OF 2001;Lim Choi Yin v. McLaren Saksama (M)Sdn. Bhd. A order for security for costs and when my wife had paid the sum of RM.60,000 into the hands of respondents’ lawyers as pursuant to her order for security; JUDGE Zainon binti Mohd. Ali went promptly on further to approve to respondents a 2nd and conflicting order to strike out petition. This 2nd order for striking out was made even without a preceding order to set aside the 1st order for security for costs. Therefore, as a consequence the RESPONDENTS RETAINED MY WIFE’S RM. 80,000 (being original Rm.60,000 plus at 5% interests accruing to reach now at Rm.80,000). Money which I borrowed from my daughters at 30% interest per year compound.<BR/><BR/>Here is another case of a judge who is an illiterate in the law because approving both na order for security for costs and then to follow up with another order for striking out (without having cancelled the 1st order for security for costs) is like HAVING THE CAKE AND EATING IT TOO. A judge at the highest level of judicial office who does not know the simple mechanics of the judicial process IS NOW SITTING ON THE BENCH OF THE MALAYSIAN COURT OF APPEAL, is this not SCARRY to you ?<BR/><BR/> I will come to the High Courtthe respondents to my wife’s Originating Petition, Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali has committed the several offences : (1) conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, (2)Malfeasance in office (3)co-conspirator to respondents OBTAINING MONEY UNDER FALSE PRETENCES (4)Abuse of judicial powers and many others; anyway these few should by law put Judge Zainon away in prison for a very long time.<BR/><BR/>I have on many occasion tried to provoke Judge to sue me in Perth but that is not going to happen because our judges in Perth are honourable men of impeccable learning and ethical beyond question. I fear to take action against Judge Zainon in Malaysia because the judges there are of questionable ethical standing and learning of the law; I will be most likely be thrown into jail under a detention order under the ISA. NOT WISE !<BR/><BR/>However I will come to KL to face off against Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali if I can be assured by Judge Mohd. Raus Shariff, to whom I had on 3 occasions discussed my case against Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali and I find that Judge Mohd. Raus Shariff a reasonable and accommodating man. I TOLD JUDGE MOHD. DARIUS SHARIFF that it is absolute nonsense that my wife’s case should be struck out, when the process had reached the stage when our counsel Mr David Hoh had attended 2 appointments for CASE MANAGEMENT ! HOW COULD JUDGE STRIKE OUT IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES; and in addition other more damaging issues against her striking out exist as well. <BR/><BR/>As I said I will come to KL to face off against Judge Zainon IF JUDGE MOHD. RAUS SHARIFF WILL ASSURE ME THAT NO SUCH DETENTION UNDER THE ISA WILL ISSUE AGAINNST ME FOR DISPARAGEMENT OF JUDGE ZAINON. I will come to KL and repeat my criminal charges against Judge Zainon and the Judge will have cause to charge me under the criminal defamation law and we will then fight it out in court. NO ISA DETENTION PLEASE !<BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/>was another day of absurdity in the annals of the judiciary when Judicial Commissioner Ridwan Ibrahim, incomprehensibly ruled on 11 March 2009 to deny the Speaker of the Perak State Assembly his right of defence.<BR/><BR/>His ridiculous decision has given the JUDICIYap Chong Yeehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01049964149247000909noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4812887797823417098.post-25233642786299912822009-03-15T07:59:00.000+08:002009-03-15T07:59:00.000+08:00Singapore charges Journal editor with contemptSING...Singapore charges Journal editor with contempt<BR/><BR/>SINGAPORE, March 14 - Singapore is charging a senior editor of the Wall<BR/>Street Journal with contempt of court for three articles last year about the<BR/>city-state's judiciary, the Straits Times reported today.<BR/><BR/>High Court Justice Tay Yong Kwang approved an application by the<BR/>attorney-general's office to start proceedings against Melanie Kirkpatrick,<BR/>deputy editor of the Journal's editorial page, the newspaper said, citing<BR/>court documents.<BR/><BR/>The attorney-general claims the articles, which appeared in the editorials<BR/>and opinion section of the Journal's Asia edition, "contained passages that<BR/>scandalise the Singapore judiciary," the paper said.<BR/><BR/>The Journal is published by Dow Jones & Co, which is owned by News Corp. Dow<BR/>Jones' spokesman in Asia, Joe Spitzer, did not immediately respond to a<BR/>message on his voicemail seeking comment.<BR/><BR/>Tay found the Journal in contempt of court in November and fined it S$25,000<BR/>(RM60,000) for publishing the same articles.<BR/><BR/>At that time, Attorney-General Walter Woon argued that editorials published<BR/>in June and July questioned the judiciary's independence from Prime Minister<BR/>Lee Hsien Loong and the ruling People's Action Party. Not meting out<BR/>punishment in the case would undermine the country's rule of law, the court<BR/>said.<BR/><BR/>Woon also objected to a letter to the editor written by Chee Soon Juan, head<BR/>of the opposition Singapore Democratic Party.<BR/><BR/>Singapore's leaders have sued journalists and political opponents several<BR/>times in recent years for alleged defamation, winning damages against<BR/>Bloomberg, the Economist and the International Herald Tribune.<BR/><BR/>Human Rights Watch called on Singapore last year to stop using defamation<BR/>lawsuits to stifle criticism and bankrupt opposition politicians, citing the<BR/>High Court's decision in October to order Chee and his party to pay<BR/>US$416,000 (RM1.5 million) to Lee and his father, Lee Kuan Yew, in damages<BR/>from a 2006 case.<BR/><BR/>Government leaders justify suing political opponents, saying it is necessary<BR/>to defend their personal and professional reputations since it bears on<BR/>their ability to govern properly and command respect from the public. - APAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4812887797823417098.post-20522724654680946952009-03-15T01:33:00.000+08:002009-03-15T01:33:00.000+08:00His credentials must be scrutinized and view his q...His credentials must be scrutinized and view his qualifications from which school he was from and if necessary send him back to law school and get him to learn which section of the law he is weak and not conversant with.For now,if he is allowed to sit as a judge,in our court of law,he could be a threat to our society for delivering wrong judgments.mohd ali ismailhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14461681328063119483noreply@blogger.com