Wednesday, 20 February 2008

Tackling the Two-Third Majority Problem: Part VI- 2004 ELECTION - JOHORE and PAHANG


Let's face it. The 2004 election result was a WORST CASE SCENARIO for the Opposition parties.

The BN won over 200 seats out of the total of 222 seats contested, with UMNO alone taking 97 seats in Peninusular and 13 seats in Sabah.

For the Opposition parties, it cannot get any worse.

As any strategist will tell you, you PLAN from the worst case scenario and HOPE for the best case outcomes.

Therefore, the lessons of the 2004 election have to be learnt by voters and by Opposition parties for their 2008 campaign.
- Malaysian Unplug


For 2004 Election Results for Constituencies in the states of :

  • PERLIS, KEDAH, KELANTAN and TRENGGANU - Click HERE

  • PENANG and PERAK - Click HERE

  • SELANGOR and KUALA LUMPUR - CLICK HERE

  • NEGRI SEMBILAN and MELAKA - Click HERE

  • CLICK HERE for SUMMARY of 2004 Election Results for EACH STATE


  • (8) JOHORE

    Photobucket


    (9) PAHANG

    Photobucket

    TO BE CONTINUED... PART VII for SABAH and SARAWAK




    Tackling the Two-Third Majority Problem: Part V- 2004 ELECTION - NEGRI SEMBILAN and MELAKA


    Let's face it. The 2004 election result was a WORST CASE SCENARIO for the Opposition parties.

    The BN won over 200 seats out of the total of 222 seats contested, with UMNO alone taking 97 seats in Peninusular and 13 seats in Sabah.

    For the Opposition parties, it cannot get any worse.

    As any strategist will tell you, you PLAN from the worst case scenario and HOPE for the best case outcomes.

    Therefore, the lessons of the 2004 election have to be learnt by voters and by Opposition parties for their 2008 campaign.
    - Malaysian Unplug


    For 2004 Election Results for Constituencies in the states of :

  • PERLIS, KEDAH, KELANTAN and TRENGGANU - Click HERE

  • PENANG and PERAK - Click HERE

  • SELANGOR and KUALA LUMPUR - CLICK HERE

  • JOHORE and PAHANG -CLICK HERE

  • CLICK HERE for SUMMARY of 2004 Election Results for EACH STATE

  • (7) NEGRI SEMBILAN and MELAKA

    Photobucket


    TO BE CONTINUED... PART VI

    Tackling the Two-Third Majority Problem: Part IV- 2004 ELECTION - SELANGOR and KUALA LUMPUR (F.T)


    Let's face it. The 2004 election result was a WORST CASE SCENARIO for the Opposition parties.

    The BN won over 200 seats out of the total of 222 seats contested, with UMNO alone taking 97 seats in Peninusular and 13 seats in Sabah.

    For the Opposition parties, it cannot get any worse.

    As any strategist will tell you, you PLAN from the worst case scenario and HOPE for the best case outcomes.

    Therefore, the lessons of the 2004 election have to be learnt by voters and by Opposition parties for their 2008 campaign.
    - Malaysian Unplug


    For 2004 Election Results for Constituencies in the states of :

  • PERLIS, KEDAH, KELANTAN and TRENGGANU - Click HERE

  • PENANG and PERAK - Click HERE

  • NEGRI SEMBILAN and MELAKA - Click HERE

  • JOHORE and PAHANG - Click HERE



  • (4 ) SELANGOR

    Photobucket


    (6) KUALA LUMPUR (Federal Territory)


    Photobucket

    TO BE CONTINUED... PART V

    Tackling the Two-Third Majority Problem: Part III- 2004 ELECTION - Penang and Perak


    Let's face it. The 2004 election result was a WORST CASE SCENARIO for the Opposition parties.

    The BN won over 200 seats out of the total of 222 seats contested, with UMNO alone taking 97 seats in Peninusular and 13 seats in Sabah.

    For the Opposition parties, it cannot get any worse.

    As any strategist will tell you, you PLAN from the worst case scenario and HOPE for the best case outcomes.

    Therefore, the lessons of the 2004 election have to be learnt by voters and by Opposition parties for their 2008 campaign.
    - Malaysian Unplug


    For 2004 Election Results for Constituencies in the states of :

  • PERLIS, KEDAH, KELANTAN and TRENGGANU - Click HERE

  • NEGRI SEMBILAN and MELAKA - Click HERE

  • JOHORE and PAHANG - Click HERE


  • (3) PENANG

    Photobucket


    (4) PERAK

    Photobucket


    To be continued...PART IV

    Tackling the Two-Third Majority Problem: Part II- 2004 ELECTION - Perlis, Kedah, Trengganu, Kelantan


    Let's face it. The 2004 election result was a WORST CASE SCENARIO for the Opposition parties.

    The BN won over 200 seats out of the total of 222 seats contested, with UMNO alone taking 97 seats in Peninusular and 13 seats in Sabah.

    For the Opposition parties, it cannot get any worse.

    As any strategist will tell you, you PLAN from the worst case scenario and HOPE for the best case outcomes.

    Therefore, the lessons of the 2004 election have to be learnt by voters and by Opposition parties for their 2008 campaign.
    - Malaysian Unplug


    For 2004 Election Results for Constituencies in the states of :

  • PENANG and PERAK - Click HERE

  • NEGRI SEMBILAN and MELAKA - Click HERE

  • JOHORE and PAHANG - Click HERE


  • (1) PERLIS and KEDAH

    Photobucket


    (2) TRENGGANU and KELANTAN

    Photobucket

    To be continued....PART III

    Monday, 18 February 2008

    Tackling the Two-Third Majority Problem: Part I - The Facts from 2004 Election

    This is the FIRST of the series on the 2008 General Election.

    We start with the findings and analysis of the 2004 General Election.

    Let's face it. The 2004 election result is a WORST CASE SCENARIO for the Opposition.

    In 2004, Barisan Nasional had won by a landslide with much much more than two-third majority. The BN won more over 200 seats out of the total of 222 seats contested, with UMNO alone taking 97 seats in Peninusular and 13 seats in Sabah.

    It cannot get any worse for the Opposition parties than their disastrous and embarrassing defeat in 2004.

    As any strategist will tell you, you PLAN from the worst case scenario and HOPE for the best case outcomes. And the result of the 2004 Election should therefore form the basis for the Opposition parties to launch their campaign to at least deny the BN the two-third majority, if not, to win Government.

    Therefore, the lessons of the 2004 election have to be learnt by voters and by Opposition parties for their 2008 campaign.

    There has to be strategic focus in those vulnerable seats in the Peninsular and in Sabah and Sarawak to deny UMNO and its cohorts in BN the 2/3 majority.

    There are 222 seats (165 in Peninsular, 25 in Sabah, and 31 in Sarawak and 1 in Labuan (Federal Territory).

    To reduce BN's two-third majority would mean, the total number of seats for the BN should be LESS than 148.

    The Opposition Parties need to win at least 75 seats spread across the 11 states in the Peninsular, Sabah , Sarawak and Labuan Federal Territory in the 2008 election.

    In 2004 landslide victory, UMNO won only 97 seats in the Peninsular and 13 in Sabah, a total of 110 seats. In the Peninsular, UMNO needs MCA and MIC seats to have the two-third majority.

    That is, the non-Malays especially the Chinese ( and the Indians) can deny the BN the two-third majority by:

    a) NOT voting MCA and MIC candidates. (Note that a VOTE FOR MCA and MIC is a VOTE for UMNO)

    b) NOT voting UMNO candidates in Malay-majority seats where UMNO has a straight fight with PAS/PKR. (These seats will be identified later).

    We would expect the Opposition Parties to have a common strategy to target and focus at least 75 IDENTIFIED vulnerable seats, not only in the Peninsular, but also in Sabah and Sarawak., to avoid "spreading the butter too thin".

    To those in Civil Society and in the Malaysian blogosphere, there is a moral obligation to assist the Opposition Parties to deny the BN the two-third majority in those vulnerable seats.

    The results of the 2004 Election would be a good starting point.

    WATCH THIS SPACE.. for further insights into the results of the 2004 Election and implications for the 2008 election.

    TABLE 1: PARLIAMENTARY SEATS WON BY BN AND OPPOSITION PARTIES BY STATE IN 2004

    Photobucket

    For 2004 Election Results for Constituencies in the states of :
  • PERLIS, KEDAH, KELANTAN and TRENGGANU - Click HERE

  • PENANG and PERAK - Click HERE

  • SELANGOR and KUALA LUMPUR - CLICK HERE

  • NEGRI SEMBILAN and MELAKA - Click HERE

  • JOHORE and PAHANG - Click HERE
  • .... TO BE CONTINUED ....

    Sunday, 17 February 2008

    WHY Barisan Nasional's TWO-THIRD (2/3) MAJORITY MUST BE DENIED by MALAYSIANS

    From People's Parliament Blog

    Excerpts: Read here article by SV Singam

    Related article:

    THE BROKEN 2004 ELECTION PROMISES OF THE BN-COALITION POLITICAL PARTIES
    "... The ruling coalition has enjoyed an almost unbroken 50 years of 2/3 majority in parliament.

    The only time this overwhelming majority was lost was in 1969. Immediately, the race riots were triggered, parliament was suspended and the National Operations Council (with 100% control) installed. The semblance of democracy was only restored after the major opposition parties were sucked into a new and larger coalition and the 2/3 majority regained.

    The ruling coalition operates on the Whip principle – component parties and representatives must toe the official line.

    Under no circumstances is a Wakil Rakyat allowed to vote (in Parliament) according to his conscience or according to the mandate the rakyat he represents gave him.

    So what has 50 years of BN's 2/3 majority given us?

    1. Federal Constitution Amended 690 Times !!!

      The Malaysian Constitution has been amended some 690 times. The USA has been in existence for more than 200 years and their constitution was only amended 27 times.

      The Constitution is amended for matters as trivial as extending the term of office of the Elections Commission officers, simply to avoid facing rejection by the Agung.

    2. Weakening of Judiciary and Legislature

      Because of the overwhelming power available to the Executive, the Legislature has been reduced to a rubber stamp, the Judiciary has been emasculated and corrupted and the powers of the Agung have been clipped.

      The legal system is a sad joke, serving only further the desires of the ruling clique.

    3. Biased Elections Commission

      The Elections Commission serves only to ENSURE that the ruling clique is returned to power.

      Look at the statistics…

      In the last (2004) election, Barisan Nasional received only 63.8% of the popular votes but has 91% of all parliamentary seats. All due to gerrymandering, phantom votes, voter relocation, voter substitution… there are even suspicions of ballot box stuffing.

      UMNO received 35.9% of the popular votes, has 50% of the parliamentary seats and holds 71% of the ministerial positions.

    4. Worthless Partners of UMNO in the Coalition

      The other members of the coalition have been reduced to running dogs, wagging their tails and begging for scraps.

    5. The Rise of UMNO's Little Napoleons

      Little Napoleons have been allowed to run rife and the rights of non-Malay, non-Muslim communities have been trampled upon. The Wakil Rakyat does nothing even when constitutional amendments threatening these rights are proposed.

      It is left to the opposition members to highlight these alarming matters and try to prevent total steamrolling.

    6. Hard-core Poverty of Malays NOT Addressed while UMNO Cronies Being Enriched by Exploiting NEP

      Meanwhile, it’s not like the rights of all Malays are really being addressed. Claims of hard-core poverty among rural Malays indicate that wealth distribution is not making real headway.

      Under the umbrella of the NEP, wealthy UMNO leaders continue to steal the wealth of the country, feeding pittance to the rakyat. And the Malays are being deprived of the ability to compete and gain new skills.

      Under the aegis of the NEP, incompetent people (skilled in politicking) are given promotions while capable people are being deprived of the opportunity to lead. Major national corporations and companies are blundering from error to error. We have lost our competitive edge in practically every field.
    How much more of this can we take? How much more of this should we take?

    Change may not necessarily be better.

    But without change, it is NOT possible to become better.

    If we want to become better, we must want change.

    It is time the 2/3 majority in parliament is dismantled.

    AND WE hold that power.


      COMMENTARY

      THE KHAIRY FACTOR IN THE NEW GOVERNMENT IF BN WINS THE 2008 ELECTION

      Read here for more

      AMARAN BUAT RAKYAT MALAYSIA

      "...Selepas pilihan raya ini maka kita akan saksikan pembentukan kerajaan baru. Kalau dahulu pilihan raya ini adalah untuk mendapatkan mandat buat Barisan Nasional tetapi kali ini adalah untuk mendapatkan mandat buat Khairy dan sekutunya memerintah Malaysia.

      Kerajaan Baru ini akan terdiri dari kroni-kroni Khairy Jamaluddin dan UMNO patut sedar bahawa keadaan ini pasti akan berlaku.

      Pilihan raya ini akan menyaksikan ramai orang Khairy yang akan bertanding dan akan membentuk kepimpinan baru di peringkat bahagian kelak. Ini sebenarnya menjurus kepada pembentukan kerajaan baru yang akan dipimpin oleh orang-orang Khairy.

      Percayalah orang-orang Khairy akan menjadi mata dan telinga beliau di setiap negeri dan akan mengambil alih kepimpinan daripada pemimpin yang sedia ada.

      Inilah yang akan membentuk kerajaan baru Khairy Jamaluddin yang sebenarnya tidak akan membawa apa-apa manfaat selain dari kuasa yang ada dibolot oleh Khairy dalam perancangannya untuk mengambil alih Malaysia.

      Orang UMNO perlu sedar sekarang bahawa banyak wakil rakyat akan dibolot oleh orang-orang Khairy dan mereka akan mempunyai kuasa di setiap bahagian kelak. Mereka akan jadi penentu untuk Khairy menjual negara kita ini.

      Kita dari UMNO perlu sedar kebinasaan yang akan berlaku kelak. Jalannya mudah – kita kena pastikan kalau Khairy bertanding – kita terpaksa berusaha mengalahkan beliau. Kita tidak mahu kerajaan baru khususnya kerajaan dalam kerajaan.

      Malaysia sebenarnya dalam keadaan bahaya kalau membiarkan Khairy terus menerus bebas menyediakan kerajaa baru beliau – kerajaan dalam kerajaan dan ini MEMBUNUH kita sebagai rakyat Malaysia. ..."

      Friday, 15 February 2008

      THE BROKEN 2004 ELECTION PROMISES OF THE BN-COALITION POLITICAL PARTIES

      On 10th March 2004, the BARISAN NASIONAL COALITON launched its Manifesto for the 11th General Eelection, with its "Cemerlang, Gemilang, Terbilang" slogan.

      The voters gave Prime Minister Badawi and the BN Coalition a landside victory hoping for change for the better to the nation, after more than 21 years of Tun Mahathir's strong-armed rule.

      There was hope in the air in 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007. The voters waited patiently for change.

      The voters waited and waited and waited.

      None came. In fact, the country went down the slippery slope.

    1. Nepotism (read the Son-In-Law and his side-kicks), cronyism and corruption (and HERE) reared their ugly heads even higher since 2004.

    2. Race and ethnic tensions became worse, at most times aggravated by senseless comments by UMNO (and here) and MCA ministers

    3. Parliamentary behaviours by the UMNO politicians were unbecoming ( remember "bocor") .

    4. The judiciary became more of a laughing stock of the nation.

    5. The Federal Constitution was tampered to extend the job of the politically-biased Chairman of the Election Commission despite strong protests by Malaysians and civil society.

    6. The electoral system is still mired with allegations of phantom voters (and HERE) and unresolved irregularities.

    7. The sanctioned use by the police of tear gas and water cannons at citizens on a peaceful march ( the Bersih rally and the Hindraf rally ) is against all human decency and uncalled for .

    8. The continuing fears of non-Muslims on the uncontrolled powers of the Syariah courts that were seen by many as trampling the fundamental rights of citizens, the frequent "body-snatching" episodes, and the sad tales of broken families due to interpretations of religious /Islamic dogmas. And the BN-Government just stood by.

      The calling of an EARLY General Election,with still another year to go, is viewed as politically prejudiced to essentially preclude the participation of Anwar Ibrahim and nothing more.

      All in all, it would appear that Prime Minister Badawi and the BN Coalition political have failed miserably to realise the high hopes and aspirations of those voters who gave the BN political parties the landslide victory in 2004.

      Worst, the BN-Government BROKE its promises to the people.

      Now the 2008 Election is here.

      We ask:
      1. SHOULD VOTERS STILL GIVE THE NOD TO THE POLITICAL PARTIES IN THE BN COALITION, namely UMNO, MCA and MIC, to run the country on a "BUSINESS AS USUAL" ?

      2. SHOULD NOT THE OPPOSITION PARTIES (PAS, PKR, DAP) BE GIVEN THE CHANCE TO PROVE THEMSELVES FOR THE NEXT FIVE YEARS, AFTER HAVING GIVEN THE BN-COALITION PARTIES THE EXTENDED PRIVILEGE TO RUN THIS COUNTRY SINCE 1957 ?

      3. Should not the MALAY HEARTLAND in the RURAL areas, who may not have full access to modern-day information technology, be helped by those in the towns and cities, to be apprised of the truth about the nation's political landscape, the nation's destiny and how they impact on their own future and that of their future generations?
      YOU, THE VOTERS, MUST NOW DECIDE, AND HAVE THE COURAGE TO DECIDE, ON HOW YOU WANT THE FATE OF YOUR FUTURE GENERATIONS TO BE LIKE!

      Read BELOW earlier related postings:

      Photobucket



      Photobucket

      Related Article

    9. From Malaysia-Today: Read here for more
    10. LET THE TRACK RECORD (of BN COALITION since 2004) SPEAKS FOR ITSELF!

      Excerpts:

      "... THE ELECTION PROMISE (from BERITA HARIAN, 11 March 2004):

      Barisan Nasional (BN) semalam melancarkan manifesto Pilihan Raya Umum ke-11 yang mahukan rakyat terus memberi mandat untuk masa depan Malaysia yang ‘Cemerlang, Gemilang, Terbilang’.

      Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi berharap rakyat memberikan peluang kepada beliau dan BN untuk membawa lonjakan pembangunan baru ke arah mencapai kejayaan yang lebih kepada negara dan rakyat.

      Abdullah dalam ucapannya pada majlis itu, menegaskan bahawa BN mahu mendapatkan mandat besar daripada rakyat dalam pilihan raya kali ini untuk mencapai hasrat ke arah itu.

      Hadir sama pada majlis pelancaran itu ialah isteri Perdana Menteri, Datin Seri Endon Mahmood; Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Najib Razak dan isteri Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor; Setiausaha Agung BN, Tan Sri Khalil Yaakob; Presiden MCA, Datuk Seri Ong Ka Ting; Presiden MIC Datuk Seri S Samy Vellu dan presiden parti komponen BN yang lain.

      Berdasarkan tema ‘Ke Arah Malaysia Cemerlang, Gemilang, Terbilang’, manifesto itu menggariskan bahawa BN untuk semua bagi memastikan tiada golongan yang dibiarkan atau diketepikan, bahkan setiap warga ada peranan dalam pembangunan negara.

      BN juga memastikan semua kaum akan diwakili selaras amalan perkongsian kuasa yang tulen; menjamin keamanan, kemakmuran dan keharmonian seluruh rakyat serta mengutamakan perpaduan negara dan memastikan satu sistem kerajaan untuk seluruh negara.

      Bagi tujuan itu, BN menyokong rakyat untuk memenuhi tuntutan dengan memerangi rasuah dan memperbaiki mutu perkhidmatan kerajaan, sentiasa prihatin terhadap keperluan rakyat dan akan merujuk kepada pandangan rakyat dalam isu-isu penting serta mengiktiraf semua golongan yang turut merangkumi generasi muda, wanita dan penduduk luar bandar sebagai aset negara, kerana semua perlu dibabitkan dalam pembangunan negara.

      Dalam manifesto itu di bawah tajuk kecil ‘BN untuk masa depan yang maju, aman dan makmur’ antara lain menggariskan:
      * BN terus melaksanakan strategi pembangunan ekonomi untuk mencapai Wawasan 2020. Bertekad meningkatkan keupayaan daya saing, menjamin suasana mesra-perniagaan dan berusaha ke arah pengurusan kewangan negara yang berhemat;

      * BN bertekad menerokai sumber kekayaan dan pendapatan baru dengan membina potensi kawasan luar bandar;

      * Bertekad membasmi kemiskinan, menambahkan pembangunan rumah kos rendah dan meningkatkan mutu perkhidmatan kesihatan, dan

      * Mendokong Islam sebagai agama rasmi Malaysia dan terus membangunkan Islam Hadhari yang progresif dan moden.
      Ia menyebut bahawa BN adalah untuk semua rakyat yang mempunyai peranan dan suara kerana BN komited kepada demokrasi berparlimen serta menjamin kepentingan semua selain menjemput semua kumpulan menyertai proses pembangunan negara.

      BN juga akan terus memelihara keamanan, kestabilan dan keharmonian di kalangan rakyat, dengan semua kumpulan etnik diwakili dalam BN melalui perkongsian kuasa, selaras dengan semangat bersatu hati dan bekerjasama.

      Mengenai ekonomi, manifesto itu menyatakan bahawa rakyat segenap lapisan boleh berasa bangga dengan pencapaian ekonomi hasil kerjasama erat semua pihak.

      Bagi menghadapi cabaran masa depan, BN bertekad untuk terus menggalakkan pertumbuhan ekonomi bagi mencapai Wawasan 2020, meningkatkan daya saing dan daya tahan ekonomi berdasarkan prestasi serta mewujudkan suasana mesra-perniagaan dan mempelopori sumber kekayaan dan pendapatan baru dalam bidang pertanian, bioteknologi dan perkhidmatan kewangan Islam.

      Dalam usaha untuk memastikan pembangunan sosioekonomi seimbang yang berterusan, BN bertekad membasmi kemiskinan sepenuhnya dan merapatkan jurang pendapatan, memastikan pembangunan wilayah yang seimbang di negeri-negeri serta mempertingkatkan keberkesanan program sosial untuk membantu kumpulan tercicir seperti Orang Asli, golongan kurang upaya dan warga tua.

      Dalam bidang pendidikan pula, BN bertekad menjadikan sekolah kebangsaan sebagai sekolah pilihan melalui peningkatan kualiti termasuk pengajaran bahasa ibunda yang lebih baik di samping memelihara kedudukan sekolah jenis kebangsaan yang sedia ada.

      Mengenai agama, BN bertekad memperbaiki pelaksanaan undang-undang syariah dalam negara dan memastikan wanita Islam dapat menikmati sistem perundangan yang adil dan saksama.

      BN juga komited meningkatkan pendidikan Islam dan memperbaiki sukatan pelajaran pendidikan Islam pada semua peringkat, mensyaratkan pelajar beragama
      Islam mengambil mata pelajaran bahasa Arab dan khatam al-Quran sewaktu di sekolah, meningkatkan kebajikan imam dan pegawai agama serta memastikan urusan jemaah haji dilakukan secara cekap dan memastikan kos mengerjakan haji dikawal pada paras munasabah.

      Manifesto itu juga menyatakan, BN bertekad memupuk nilai akhlak yang tinggi, keyakinan diri serta keberanian untuk menghadapi cabaran di kalangan belia dan remaja melalui Latihan Khidmat Negara, Rakan Muda dan program khidmat masyarakat yang lain.

      Ia juga mahu memperkenalkan satu kod etika dan integriti untuk sektor awam dan swasta, parti-parti politik serta masyarakat umum.

      Selain itu, BN bertekad untuk menjamin kebebasan badan kehakiman dan menyediakan prasarana moden untuk meningkatkan kecekapan pentadbiran keadilan.

      Bagi perkhidmatan awam pula, BN akan meneruskan usaha untuk memperbaiki sistem penyampaian perkhidmatan awam menerusi perkongsian dengan sektor perkhidmatan awam untuk memenuhi keperluan rakyat yang semakin meningkat.

      Untuk dasar luar pula, BN berazam memastikan Malaysia tetap memainkan peranan aktif dalam isu antarabangsa serta mengekalkan hubungan damai dengan semua negara tanpa mengira taraf ekonomi, ideologi dan sistem politik.

      Untuk semua itu, BN berikrar untuk terus mempertahankan kemerdekaan serta kedaulatan, menjunjung prinsip Rukun Negara, demi menjamin kestabilan negara serta keutuhan perpaduan rakyat untuk terus hidup dalam suasana harmoni, aman dan damai...."
      COMMENTARY

      From readers of Malaysia-Today: Read here for more

      1. "... Adakah kita mempunyai seorang pemimpin Islam yang tidak mempunyai maruah dan prinsip? Kepada dia menipu adalah perbuatan main-main ala ‘tipu sunat’? Cuba nilaikan dia ni. Dia kata dia tidak akan membuat pembubaran pada keesokan harinya, tetapi esoknya dia bubarkan juga!

        Dia beri jaminan tidak akan membuat pembubaran semasa hari perayaan tahun baru orang Tiong Hua, tetapi janjinya tidak dikota. Apa jenis pemimpin dia ni? Dia seharusnya tidak boleh terus berkuasa lagi. Jahanam negara kita. Apa boleh kita baca dari peristiwa pertama?

        Yang jelasnya dia bersemangat mempamirkan kebijaksanaannya dan kejantanannya dengan menunjuk-nunjuk dia boleh buat keputusan sendiri. Tetapi, apabila dia balik kerumah, keputusanya dipertikaikan oleh anak-isteri dan menantu!

        Esoknya, bagai lembu dijerut hidung …..dia akan ubah pendirian awalnya dan ikut cakap bini, anak dan/atau menantu! ..."


      2. "... Between the devil and the deep blue sea, I choose the deep blue sea. Although filled with uncertainty, at least I can be certain that sexist, racist, self serving, corrupt "leaders" that we presently have will be sent the message that we, THE PEOPLE, are their employers and that WE sack them! Coffeeshop talk is cheap and in vain. Put our money where our mouths are and VOTE THEM OUT.


      3. "... Yes, his track record is about all the lies and broken promises since day one. Even on the last day he lied. He started with a lie and ended with a lie".


      4. "... Much as we would like to vote the BN out, however the reality on the ground is that UMNO/BN will again be voted in by the people in the kampong and rural areas with a 2/3rds majority. And with so much gerrymandering in the urban areas, and areas with high concentration of voters, there is no way UMNO/BN is going to lose. Imagine 100,000 voters in the urban area to one MP, and 10,000 voters in the rural areas/kampongs to one MP. How is UMNO/BN going to lose?

        Just conduct a random interview with 100 voters, and find out how many of them have ever read M-T and Malaysiakini? I doubt you can find more than 5 in 100 who read these two on-line news media. Anyway my vote will definitely go to the opposition, whether for DUN or MP. UMNO/BN has a very strong assistant/supporter in this Ra-"Shit" guy. They can depend on him 100% to deliver the results ..."


      5. "... Dear Malaysians, We all know that BN with its goverment machinery and corrupted policies will again emerged the goverment after the next GE due to its racist policies that easily influence rural voters with less awareness of democratic human rights political system.

        I strongly pursuade the rest of us to vote in PKR, DAP and PAS to reduce BN 2/3 majority which is very crucial for this country future if it really wants to be a fully develop progressive country where opportunities are not base on creed, religion and race but basic fundamental humanrights.

        By all means, we must give the opposition especially Anwar Inbrahim a chance to represent us in the parliament. Honestly, he is the only candidate which is perfectly designed to caused massive havocs to the racist BN governing elites and power player.

        It is now or never. If BN win massively this time, you and I will be paying for a very steep price. ..."


      6. "... The time has come.. Never before had such a time ever came. A time to teach BN a lesson that they will never forget. A time to get rid of inefficient leaders like Pak Lah, Samy, Koh, Nazri, Zam, Hisham and Ong. Get these guys out!! PLEASE!!!! Everyone work toward this and March 9th. will be a glorious day for Malaysia. ..."



      7. "... My shortest answer is that he absolutely FAILED ! Let's all do our part to make sure that blogs likes this gets to reach out to the masses who are mostly mentally overwhelmed by the brainwashing detergent dished out by the gomen's owned medias.

        Photobucket



      8. "...please set aside our differences for the future of this country. Let vote out the current BN people, and bring in capable leader whom would bring even prosperity, wealth, education and comfort to us Malaysians. It is the least that we could do for this wonderful country and people.

    11. From Malaysiakini Reader: Read here for more, "NON-Malays, the Main Problem"

      Excerpts:
      "The NON-Malay Voters

      ... It was the NON -Malay that kept the ruling administration in power with their votes.

      ... when push comes to shove, the NON-Malays turn away and continue to live by the deteriorating system while engineering their own escape options.

      The non-Malay continues with his belief that ‘all is lost’ if we don't re-elect for the ruling alliance.

      This is core of the problem amongst the NON-Malays.

      The real issue is probably the non-Malays support for the BN and they comprising almost 40 percent of society. This group continues to support the ruling administration due to FEAR .

      The Malay Voters

      Whereas the Malays themselves are ready to face any repercussions. Basically, the Malay's are generally upset with the ruling administration and this was depicted by the swing during the 1990 elections with the birth of Semangat 46 challenging Dr Mahathir Mohamad and then 1999 with PKR challenging Mahathir again.

      The Malay, in general, has a proven track record as far as the general elections are concerned.

      The Bersih rally had a considerable impact because there is genuine dissatisfaction. Who were the majority participants?

      A non-Malay will continue to support the same administration while creating their own options. The intrinsic motives of the non-Malay prevails and it lacks the altruism needed for the society.

      CREATING BANGSA MALAYSIA

      To create a true Bangsa Malaysia, the non-Malay needs to understand what one's own priority is. Are you there for your individual needs or for a collective need that requires your wholehearted effort to achieve rather than being a turncoat for Bangsa Malaysia?

      When do we, the non-Malays, along with the steadfast Malays unite to actually fulfill our will to create a Bangsa Malaysia rather than crusading on a fault finding mission on how it should be.

      If I and other non- Malays need to vote for PAS, there should be no qualms as long as our move serves Bangsa Malaysia. After 50 years under the same administration, how different can it be for non-Malays?

      Let us, the non-Malays, together with the Malays make a change for the betterment of our future generations.
    12. Thursday, 14 February 2008

      General Election: Time to Bring Down UMNO's Lapdogs

      From "Politics 101" Blog: Read here

      This is the first Valentine’s Day (14th Feb) in living memory that the mullahs in PAS didn’t issue a fatwa against the celebration of it.

      For that alone, if you are a non-Muslim voting in a straight fight between Umno and PAS, just give PAS a chance to help reduce the BN’s majority.

      For good governance and democracy to bloom, UMNO must be severely crippled and its hypocrite brand of Islam Badawi must be confined to Abdullah’s bedroom.

      In 1999, the Chinese hesitated and did not roll along with the reformasi spirit. If they had, the BN’s 2/3 majority would have disappeared.

      Now, the non Malays are given a second chance to make amends for their mistake in 1999.

      If we muck up our second chance and again let the racist, Islamist Umno off the hook, we deserve Umno doing ‘big business’ on us and our future.

      To cripple Umno, we have to first destroy the political lapdogs who prop up Umno, starting with Umno’s senior running dogs MCA, Gerakan and MIC.

      [ The TRUTH is: A Vote for MCA, MIC and Gerakan, is a Vote for UMNO]

      Like in K1 kickboxing, you got to take out the legs of a bigger opponent before you can take down the guy.

      • Umno must pay for all its failures and threats against non Bumis.

      • MCA, Gerakan and MIC must pay dearly for abetting in Corporate Umno’s crimes against ordinary Malaysians of ALL races.

      2008 must mark the start of the fall of UMNO.

      RELATED ARTICLE

    13. From Al-Husseyn Blog: Read here article "HANCUR UMNO" for more
    14. "... Istilah "kalahkan UMNO" atau "jatuhkan UMNO" jarang digunakan oleh orang-orang PAS; tetapi "Hancur Umno" adalah.

      Saya teringatkan kepada arwah 'Pak Din Hancor' yang selalu berjualan diMasjid Ar-Rahman UM dulu dan arwah Pak Haji Jamal yang lebih dikenali sebagai 'Haji PAS' disekitar bandar Ipoh dulu.

      Kedua-dua mereka ini berasal dari Parit dan ungkapan mereka "Hancur Umno" sangat dirindui kerana ada "ummph"-nya!

      PAS terpaksa berhadapan dengan Umno kerana masing-masing bertanding dikawasan majoriti Melayu.

      Mengalahkan Umno bermakna mengalahkan BN kerana Umno adalah back bone .BN mempunyai 198 kerusi Parlimen. 110 adalah Umno.

      Umno walaupun tanpa parti komponen lain , dia mampu memerintah.Sebab itu Ali Rustam MB Melaka beranai cabar parti komponen supaya berambus dari BN!

      MIC dan MCA adalah parti yg opportunis - begitulah komponen yang lain; keadaan ini memaksa mereka patuh kepada apa sahaja kehendak Umno asalkan mereka mendapat sedikit habuan 'ehsan' dari Umno.

      Contoh kes HINDRAF - etnik India protes kerana MIC gagal memperjuangkan nasib mereka. MIC bukan boleh buat apa kalau Umno tidak luluskan, betul tak?

      Apabila keadaan MIC terancam , Umno terpaksa selamatkan MIC , maka luluslah beberapa tuntutan etnik India baru-baru ini --- cuti Thaipusam diberikan , pemulihan dan bantuan SRJKT dapat dan entah apa macam lagi hingga soal pendaftaran tiada surat beranak entah berapa puluh ribu yang dituntut....

      PAS tidak terhad kepada Melayu; asalkan seseorang itu berugama Islam pasti boleh menjadi ahlinya.

      .... bukan semua ahli Umno tu Islam dan Melayu.Semak fakta keahlian Umno di Sabah , Sarawak dan juga Perlis.Jeane isteri PM Abdullah tu orang bangsa Serani tetapi boleh diterima menjadi ahli Umno walaupun bukan keturunan Melayu.

      Umno pada realitinya BUKAN sebuah
      Parti Melayu .

      Dan juga bukan sebuah Parti Islam : Dari 104 cawangan UMNO yang ada dalam bahagian itu cuma 6 cawangan yang diketuai oleh orang Islam. Kalu nak baca selanjutnya sila klik
      di sini

      Orang Umno lah yang tolong bantu memenangkan MIC dan MCA dimana-mana.

      Hinggakan Samy Vellu kata dulu "Dara saya Umno, jiwa saya Umno..."

      Setakad itu dulu yang dapat saya katakan..."

    15. From "Tumpang Sekoleh" Blog: Read here for more
      Glossary of UMNO / BN terms

      “Accountability”
      only applies to publicly exposed sexual indiscretion and NOT financial scandal or abuse of power.

      “Anti-corruption” means only the small fish, or those who are no longer favoured by the PM, are investigated and prosecuted; and not across the board, without fear or favour.

      “Bad things will happen if opposition wins big” means we will engineer another riot and impose Emergency Rule.

      “Clean” means turning a blind eye on all evidence of graft or abuse of power, and usually follows “We will look into it”, and is a perk that’s only extended to top tier government politicians.

      “Cost effectiveness” only applies to the private sector, and certain unfavoured public sector.

      “Democracy” means majority mob rules, without regard for rule of law, respect for fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution, real public consultation, or meaningful and intelligent debate in the Parliament.

      “Free and fair elections” means strictly free for the ruling coalition to abuse state apparatus during campaign period, breaching Electoral Laws by promising projects as bribes, monopolising the media and demeaning the opposition, benefiting from ages of gerrymandering, and having a compliant Election Commission.

      “Freedom of assembly” is only for supporters of the ruling coalition - any opposition rally is deemed a threat to “National Security”

      “I can’t remember” means I can actually remember those corrupt things I did but I am counting on the commissioners of inquiry, police, ACA investigators etc… not to draw any adverse inference on my credibility, because they are supposed to know how to do their job. (of protecting me)

      “I will listen” means listening only to self-serving kaki bodeks; and not the civil society and public at large.

      “Independence of the Judiciary” means freedom from the influence of all other political forces, except UMNO, and depending on the generosity of UMNO &BN. Correct,correct,
      correct...

      “Islamic state” which by definition means a theocratic state, still means a state run by a secular constitution, but the Islamic authorities including syariah courts get to encroach into the space of civil law in spite of the original social contract.

      “Malay rights” means the right of UMNO to taxpayers’ money through award of contracts without open tender.

      “Malaysia boleh” means UMNO/BN goons can essentially do anything they want and get away with it, except maybe when near elections.

      “National security” means the political security of UMNO/BN, and not the nation as a whole.

      “National unity” means Malays united behind UMNO to perpetuate electoral majority, and not necessarily unity of all races in Malaysia.

      “NEP still required” means UMNO/BN is not done milking the coffers, and it’s good to have poverty ridden Malays to justify continuation of the policy.

      “Politicking” is a naughty word, usually only applies to Opposition criticism of the government, side-stepping the issue being criticised about.

      “Power sharing” in the context of Barisan Nasional means,
    16. if UMNO says sit, you ask how long.
    17. If UMNO says jump, you say how high. If UMNO makes any pronouncements, you should, without missing a heartbeat, say you agree and that it is good for the nation.
    18. Also means UMNO gets to embezzle most of taxpayers’ money and petroleum profit and leave the crumps to MCA and MIC.
    19. Of course, crony businessmen of other races can share in the UMNO orgy, but just a small fraction.
      “Press freedom” is when the press gets to report half-truths or simply outright lies, or omits to report newsworthy items, all in favour of the ruling coalition.

      “Progress” is when you spend millions sending a space tourist to space with no discernible leap in technological innovation for the nation, except damaged experiments and pretty pictures, and a promise to do the same thing again in the near future.

      “Public consultation” means we only appear to listen.

      “Public order” means we say jump, you ask how high, and ties in to “National Security”.

      “the Rakyat is happy with [*]” - * being variables such as “ISA”, “Judiciary”, “Police”, “Economy” etc… means UMNO is happy with the state of affairs, nevermind what the rakyat really wants.

      “Sedition” means instilling hatred in the ruling coalition as a political entity, instead of the universal meaning of instilling hatred against the government structure of the nation itself, such as when the Communists sought to bring down the Tsars in Russia, or the republic, in China.

      “Sensitive issue” means any issue that potentially erodes support for UMNO, especially when pointing out how UMNO plunders the coffers, or practices devisive and racist politics.

      “Transparency” applies only to the private sector, opposition parties, and non-favoured public authorities; not UMNO/BN.

      “We are fair” means the ruling coalition treats transgressions of law, within itself, with kid’s gloves, and everyone else gets the full brunt of the law, i.e. selective prosecution.

      “We will look into it” in the context of opposition complaints means the file is marked “No further action required”.

      “Work with me“, that is, until we have completely plundered the economy, provide for another 10 generations of our children and grandchildren, and comfortably retire in another paradise island, leaving the rest behind high and dry.
    20. Wednesday, 13 February 2008

      Changing the Government Rejuvenates the Nation and the People: Australia

      Australia Says 'SORRY' to its Aboriginal People' s (Orang Asli) "Stolen Generation"


      Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's Apology Address in Parliament - Part One


      Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's Apology Address in Parliament - Part Two


      Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's Apology Address in Parliament - Part Three


      Photobucket
      Prime Minister Kevin Rudd delivers his historic apology to indigenous Australians. Picture courtesy of The Australian

      Quote

      " To change the country, you need to change the Government "

      After eleven years in the Opposition, the Australian Labour Party under the leadership of Kevin Rudd unseated the Government of John Howard in November 2007.

      John Howard's Coalition Government was mean-spirited and refused to say "SORRY" after the "BRINGING THEM HOME' Report was made public in 1997. Read here the full "Bringing them home" Report.

      Today, in a momentous occasion of Australia's history, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, with the support of the Opposition Leader, leads the Australian people to say "SORRY " to the Aboriginal people (the Orang Asli) and the 'Stolen Generation' .

      UPDATE

      Photobucket

      John Howard was on his morning walk as the nation prepared to say sorry. (Photo courtesy of The Australian )

      FORMER Prime Minister John Howard boycotted today's historic apology to the Stolen Generations but still found time to go for his traditional morning walk.

      Former Prime Ministers Gough Whitlam, Malcolm Fraser, Bob Hawke, Paul Keating and former governor-general William Deane attended the historic event, sitting on the floor of Parliament House along with Aboriginal leaders who were embraced by Mr Rudd and Liberal leader Brendan Nelson after the apology.

      Mr Howard was the only living former Prime Minister NOT to attend today.

      Prime Minister Kevin Rudd ended more than a decade of waiting by Aborigines by asking MPs to formally say sorry for the pain and suffering inflicted on tens of thousands of indigenous people taken from their families.

      Some in federal parliament's public gallery, including members of the stolen generations, wept as Mr Rudd delivered the formal apology - the first official business of the new Labor government.

      MPs were given a long, standing ovation as they rose to their feet to vote in support of the motion.

      In city squares and parks across Australia, and on the lawns outside Parliament House in Canberra, people cheered, applauded, hugged and cried after the apology was delivered.

      - End of Update

      FULL TEXT of the Australian Prime Minister's address in the Australian Parliament:

      "Today we honour the Indigenous peoples of this land, the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

      We reflect on their past mistreatment.

      We reflect in particular on the mistreatment of those who were stolen generations - this blemished chapter in our nation's history.

      The time has now come for the nation to turn a new page in Australia's history by righting the wrongs of the past and so moving forward with confidence to the future.

      We apologise for the laws and policies of successive Parliaments and governments that have inflicted profound grief, suffering and loss on these our fellow Australians.

      We apologise especially for the removal of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from their families, their communities and their country.

      For the pain, suffering and hurt of these stolen generations, their descendants and for their families left behind, we say sorry.

      To the mothers and the fathers, the brothers and the sisters, for the breaking up of families and communities, we say sorry.

      And for the indignity and degradation thus inflicted on a proud people and a proud culture, we say sorry.

      We the Parliament of Australia respectfully request that this apology be received in the spirit in which it is offered as part of the healing of the nation.

      For the future we take heart; resolving that this new page in the history of our great continent can now be written.

      We today take this first step by acknowledging the past and laying claim to a future that embraces all Australians.

      A future where this Parliament resolves that the injustices of the past must never, never happen again.

      A future where we harness the determination of all Australians, Indigenous and non-Indigenous, to close the gap that lies between us in life expectancy, educational achievement and economic opportunity.

      A future where we embrace the possibility of new solutions to enduring problems where old approaches have failed.

      A future based on mutual respect, mutual resolve and mutual responsibility.

      A future where all Australians, whatever their origins, are truly equal partners, with equal opportunities and with an equal stake in shaping the next chapter in the history of this great country, Australia.

      There comes a time in the history of nations when their peoples must become fully reconciled to their past if they are to go forward with confidence to embrace their future. Our nation, Australia, has reached such a time. That is why the parliament is today here assembled: to deal with this unfinished business of the nation, to remove a great stain from the nation’s soul and, in a true spirit of reconciliation, to open a new chapter in the history of this great land, Australia.

      Last year I made a commitment to the Australian people that if we formed the next government of the Commonwealth we would in parliament say sorry to the stolen generations. Today I honour that commitment. I said we would do so early in the life of the new parliament.

      Again, today I honour that commitment by doing so at the commencement of this the 42nd parliament of the Commonwealth. Because the time has come, well and truly come, for all peoples of our great country, for all citizens of our great Commonwealth, for all Australians—those who are Indigenous and those who are not—to come together to reconcile and together build a new future for our nation.

      Some have asked, "Why apologise?"

      Let me begin to answer by telling the parliament just a little of one person’s story—an elegant, eloquent and wonderful woman in her 80s, full of life, full of funny stories, despite what has happened in her life’s journey, a woman who has travelled a long way to be with us today, a member of the stolen generation who shared some of her story with me when I called around to see her just a few days ago.

      Nanna Nungala Fejo, as she prefers to be called, was born in the late 1920s. She remembers her earliest childhood days living with her family and her community in a bush camp just outside Tennant Creek. She remembers the love and the warmth and the kinship of those days long ago, including traditional dancing around the camp fire at night. She loved the dancing.

      She remembers once getting into strife when, as a four-year-old girl, she insisted on dancing with the male tribal elders rather than just sitting and watching the men, as the girls were supposed to do.

      But then, sometime around 1932, when she was about four, she remembers the coming of the welfare men. Her family had feared that day and had dug holes in the creek bank where the children could run and hide. What they had not expected was that the white welfare men did not come alone.

      They brought a truck, two white men and an Aboriginal stockman on horseback cracking his stockwhip. The kids were found; they ran for their mothers, screaming, but they could not get away. They were herded and piled onto the back of the truck. Tears flowing, her mum tried clinging to the sides of the truck as her children were taken away to the Bungalow in Alice, all in the name of protection.

      A few years later, government policy changed. Now the children would be handed over to the missions to be cared for by the churches. But which church would care for them? The kids were simply told to line up in three lines. Nanna Fejo and her sister stood in the middle line, her older brother and cousin on her left.

      Those on the left were told that they had become Catholics, those in the middle Methodists and those on the right Church of England. That is how the complex questions of post-reformation theology were resolved in the Australian outback in the 1930s. It was as crude as that.

      She and her sister were sent to a Methodist mission on Goulburn Island and then Croker Island. Her Catholic brother was sent to work at a cattle station and her cousin to a Catholic mission. Nanna Fejo’s family had been broken up for a second time.

      She stayed at the mission until after the war, when she was allowed to leave for a prearranged job as a domestic in Darwin. She was 16. Nanna Fejo never saw her mum again. After she left the mission, her brother let her know that her mum had died years before, a broken woman fretting for the children that had literally been ripped away from her.

      I asked Nanna Fejo what she would have me say today about her story. She thought for a few moments then said that what I should say today was that all mothers are important. And she added: ‘Families—keeping them together is very important. It’s a good thing that you are surrounded by love and that love is passed down the generations. That’s what gives you happiness.’

      As I left, later on, Nanna Fejo took one of my staff aside, wanting to make sure that I was not too hard on the Aboriginal stockman who had hunted those kids down all those years ago. The stockman had found her again decades later, this time himself to say, ‘Sorry.’ And remarkably, extraordinarily, she had forgiven him.

      Nanna Fejo’s is just one story.

      There are thousands, tens of thousands of them: stories of forced separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from their mums and dads over the better part of a century. Some of these stories are graphically told in Bringing them home, the report commissioned in 1995 by Prime Minister Keating and received in 1997 by Prime Minister Howard.

      There is something terribly primal about these firsthand accounts. The pain is searing; it screams from the pages. The hurt, the humiliation, the degradation and the sheer brutality of the act of physically separating a mother from her children is a deep assault on our senses and on our most elemental humanity.

      These stories cry out to be heard; they cry out for an apology. Instead, from the nation’s parliament there has been a stony, stubborn and deafening silence for more than a decade; a view that somehow we, the parliament, should suspend our most basic instincts of what is right and what is wrong; a view that, instead, we should look for any pretext to push this great wrong to one side, to leave it languishing with the historians, the academics and the cultural warriors, as if the stolen generations are little more than an interesting sociological phenomenon.

      But the stolen generations are not intellectual curiosities. They are human beings, human beings who have been damaged deeply by the decisions of parliaments and governments. But, as of today, the time for denial, the time for delay, has at last come to an end.

      The nation is demanding of its political leadership to take us forward. Decency, human decency, universal human decency, demands that the nation now step forward to right an historical wrong. That is what we are doing in this place today.

      But should there still be doubts as to why we must now act, let the parliament reflect for a moment on the following facts: that, between 1910 and 1970, between 10 and 30 per cent of Indigenous children were forcibly taken from their mothers and fathers; that, as a result, up to 50,000 children were forcibly taken from their families; that this was the product of the deliberate, calculated policies of the state as reflected in the explicit powers given to them under statute; that this policy was taken to such extremes by some in administrative authority that the forced extractions of children of so-called ‘mixed lineage’ were seen as part of a broader policy of dealing with ‘the problem of the Aboriginal population’.

      One of the most notorious examples of this approach was from the Northern Territory Protector of Natives, who stated: "Generally by the fifth and invariably by the sixth generation, all native characteristics of the Australian aborigine are eradicated. The problem of our half-castes— to quote the protector— will quickly be eliminated by the complete disappearance of the black race, and the swift submergence of their progeny in the white ... "

      The Western Australian Protector of Natives expressed not dissimilar views, expounding them at length in Canberra in 1937 at the first national conference on Indigenous affairs that brought together the Commonwealth and state protectors of natives.

      These are uncomfortable things to be brought out into the light. They are not pleasant. They are profoundly disturbing. But we must acknowledge these facts if we are to deal once and for all with the argument that the policy of generic forced separation was somehow well motivated, justified by its historical context and, as a result, unworthy of any apology today.

      Then we come to the argument of intergenerational responsibility, also used by some to argue against giving an apology today. But let us remember the fact that the forced removal of Aboriginal children was happening as late as the early 1970s.

      The 1970s is not exactly a point in remote antiquity. There are still serving members of this parliament who were first elected to this place in the early 1970s. It is well within the adult memory span of many of us. The uncomfortable truth for us all is that the parliaments of the nation, individually and collectively, enacted statutes and delegated authority under those statutes that made the forced removal of children on racial grounds fully lawful.

      There is a further reason for an apology as well: it is that reconciliation is in fact an expression of a core value of our nation—and that value is a fair go for all.

      There is a deep and abiding belief in the Australian community that, for the stolen generations, there was no fair go at all. There is a pretty basic Aussie belief that says that it is time to put right this most outrageous of wrongs.

      It is for these reasons, quite apart from concerns of fundamental human decency, that the governments and parliaments of this nation must make this apology—because, put simply, the laws that our parliaments enacted made the stolen generations possible.

      We, the parliaments of the nation, are ultimately responsible, not those who gave effect to our laws.

      And the problem lay with the laws themselves.

      As has been said of settler societies elsewhere, we are the bearers of many blessings from our ancestors; therefore we must also be the bearer of their burdens as well. Therefore, for our nation, the course of action is clear: that is, to deal now with what has become one of the darkest chapters in Australia’s history.

      In doing so, we are doing more than contending with the facts, the evidence and the often rancorous public debate.

      In doing so, we are also wrestling with our own soul. This is not, as some would argue, a black-armband view of history; it is just the truth: the cold, confronting, uncomfortable truth—facing it, dealing with it, moving on from it.

      Until we fully confront that truth, there will always be a shadow hanging over us and our future as a fully united and fully reconciled people. It is time to reconcile. It is time to recognise the injustices of the past. It is time to say sorry. It is time to move forward together.

      To the stolen generations, I say the following: as Prime Minister of Australia, I am sorry. On behalf of the government of Australia, I am sorry. On behalf of the parliament of Australia, I am sorry. I offer you this apology without qualification.

      We apologise for the hurt, the pain and suffering that we, the parliament, have caused you by the laws that previous parliaments have enacted. We apologise for the indignity, the degradation and the humiliation these laws embodied.

      We offer this apology to the mothers, the fathers, the brothers, the sisters, the families and the communities whose lives were ripped apart by the actions of successive governments under successive parliaments.

      In making this apology, I would also like to speak personally to the members of the stolen generations and their families: to those here today, so many of you; to those listening across the nation—from Yuendumu, in the central west of the Northern Territory, to Yabara, in North Queensland, and to Pitjantjatjara in South Australia.

      I know that, in offering this apology on behalf of the government and the parliament, there is nothing I can say today that can take away the pain you have suffered personally. Whatever words I speak today, I cannot undo that. Words alone are not that powerful; grief is a very personal thing. I ask those non-indigenous Australians listening today who may not fully understand why what we are doing is so important to imagine for a moment that this had happened to you.

      I say to honourable members here present: imagine if this had happened to us.

      Imagine the crippling effect. Imagine how hard it would be to forgive. My proposal is this: if the apology we extend today is accepted in the spirit of reconciliation, in which it is offered, we can today resolve together that there be a new beginning for Australia. And it is to such a new beginning that I believe the nation is now calling us.

      Australians are a passionate lot. We are also a very practical lot. For us, symbolism is important but, unless the great symbolism of reconciliation is accompanied by an even greater substance, it is little more than a clanging gong. It is not sentiment that makes history; it is our actions that make history.

      Today’s apology, however inadequate, is aimed at righting past wrongs. It is also aimed at building a bridge between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians—a bridge based on a real respect rather than a thinly veiled contempt.

      Our challenge for the future is to cross that bridge and, in so doing, to embrace a new partnership between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians—to embrace, as part of that partnership, expanded Link-up and other critical services to help the stolen generations to trace their families if at all possible and to provide dignity to their lives.

      But the core of this partnership for the future is to close the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians on life expectancy, educational achievement and employment opportunities.

      This new partnership on closing the gap will set concrete targets for the future: within a decade to halve the widening gap in literacy, numeracy and employment outcomes and opportunities for Indigenous Australians, within a decade to halve the appalling gap in infant mortality rates between Indigenous and non-Indigenous children and, within a generation, to close the equally appalling 17-year life gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous in overall life expectancy.

      The truth is: a business as usual approach towards Indigenous Australians is not working. Most old approaches are not working.

      We need a new beginning—a new beginning which contains real measures of policy success or policy failure; a new beginning, a new partnership, on closing the gap with sufficient flexibility not to insist on a one-size-fits-all approach for each of the hundreds of remote and regional Indigenous communities across the country but instead allowing flexible, tailored, local approaches to achieve commonly-agreed national objectives that lie at the core of our proposed new partnership; a new beginning that draws intelligently on the experiences of new policy settings across the nation. However, unless we as a parliament set a destination for the nation, we have no clear point to guide our policy, our programs or our purpose; we have no centralised organising principle.

      Let us resolve today to begin with the little children—a fitting place to start on this day of apology for the stolen generations. Let us resolve over the next five years to have every Indigenous four-year-old in a remote Aboriginal community enrolled in and attending a proper early childhood education centre or opportunity and engaged in proper preliteracy and prenumeracy programs.

      Let us resolve to build new educational opportunities for these little ones, year by year, step by step, following the completion of their crucial preschool year. Let us resolve to use this systematic approach to build future educational opportunities for Indigenous children to provide proper primary and preventive health care for the same children, to begin the task of rolling back the obscenity that we find today in infant mortality rates in remote Indigenous communities—up to four times higher than in other communities.

      None of this will be easy. Most of it will be hard—very hard. But none of it is impossible, and all of it is achievable with clear goals, clear thinking, and by placing an absolute premium on respect, cooperation and mutual responsibility as the guiding principles of this new partnership on closing the gap.

      The mood of the nation is for reconciliation now, between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. The mood of the nation on Indigenous policy and politics is now very simple. The nation is calling on us, the politicians, to move beyond our infantile bickering, our point-scoring and our mindlessly partisan politics and to elevate this one core area of national responsibility to a rare position beyond the partisan divide. Surely this is the unfulfilled spirit of the 1967 referendum. Surely, at least from this day forward, we should give it a go.

      Let me take this one step further and take what some may see as a piece of political posturing and make a practical proposal to the opposition on this day, the first full sitting day of the new parliament. I said before the election that the nation needed a kind of war cabinet on parts of Indigenous policy, because the challenges are too great and the consequences are too great to allow it all to become a political football, as it has been so often in the past.

      I therefore propose a joint policy commission, to be led by the Leader of the Opposition and me, with a mandate to develop and implement—to begin with—an effective housing strategy for remote communities over the next five years. It will be consistent with the government’s policy framework, a new partnership for closing the gap.

      If this commission operates well, I then propose that it work on the further task of constitutional recognition of the first Australians, consistent with the longstanding platform commitments of my party and the pre-election position of the opposition.

      This would probably be desirable in any event because, unless such a proposition were absolutely bipartisan, it would fail at a referendum. As I have said before, the time has come for new approaches to enduring problems. Working constructively together on such defined projects would, I believe, meet with the support of the nation. It is time for fresh ideas to fashion the nation’s future.

      Mr Speaker, today the parliament has come together to right a great wrong. We have come together to deal with the past so that we might fully embrace the future. We have had sufficient audacity of faith to advance a pathway to that future, with arms extended rather than with fists still clenched. So let us seize the day.

      Let it not become a moment of mere sentimental reflection. Let us take it with both hands and allow this day, this day of national reconciliation, to become one of those rare moments in which we might just be able to transform the way in which the nation thinks about itself, whereby the injustice administered to the stolen generations in the name of these, our parliaments, causes all of us to reappraise, at the deepest level of our beliefs, the real possibility of reconciliation writ large: reconciliation across all Indigenous Australia; reconciliation across the entire history of the often bloody encounter between those who emerged from the Dreamtime a thousand generations ago and those who, like me, came across the seas only yesterday; reconciliation which opens up whole new possibilities for the future.

      It is for the nation to bring the first two centuries of our settled history to a close, as we begin a new chapter. We embrace with pride, admiration and awe these great and ancient cultures we are truly blessed to have among us—cultures that provide a unique, uninterrupted human thread linking our Australian continent to the most ancient prehistory of our planet.

      Growing from this new respect, we see our Indigenous brothers and sisters with fresh eyes, with new eyes, and we have our minds wide open as to how we might tackle, together, the great practical challenges that Indigenous Australia faces in the future.

      Let us turn this page together: Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians, government and opposition, Commonwealth and state, and write this new chapter in our nation’s story together. First Australians, First Fleeters, and those who first took the oath of allegiance just a few weeks ago.

      Let’s grasp this opportunity to craft a new future for this great land: Australia. I commend the motion to the House. "
      -Kevin Rudd, Prime Minister of Australia

      RELATED ARTICLES

    21. By Jenny Macklin, Federal Aboriginal Affairs Minister.

      Excerpts: Read here for more

      Photobucket ".. It was a new page in our national story: 226 members and senators welcomed to Parliament House by the traditional owners of the land.

      And now, with bipartisan support, it’s set to be written into the opening of every Australian parliament.

      Here was the chance to better understand the idea of reconciliation, to forge a new partnership between indigenous and non-indigenous Australians. A partnership based on equality, respect and mutual responsibility to reverse the crippling inequalities experienced by so many indigenous Australians.

      This morning, the story unfolds when parliament offers an apology to the Stolen Generations. We will apologise for the laws and policies of past governments that inflicted such profound grief and loss on indigenous Australians.

      Saying sorry gives us the impetus to move on. It means we can now get on with the vital job of closing the gap between indigenous and non-indigenous Australians.
      The Government fully comprehends the enormous effort required to close this gap and we know it can be done only in a mutually responsible partnership with indigenous Australians.

      That’s why we must harness the spirit and energy of this week’s events to drive the reforms that will ensure the fundamentals of a decent life: good health and nutrition, a safe and comfortable home, a high-quality education and the opportunity to share in the dividends of participation in the economy through work.

      I have no illusions about the extent and complexity of the challenge before us. But I don’t doubt that it can be done.

      And no one should doubt this Government’s passionate commitment to getting the job done. It is our passion to build a fair and just Australia.

      A nation where a child growing up in Sydney and a child growing up in the Kimberley can look forward to the same future; where it doesn’t make any difference whether you’re born in the bush or the city; where good health and a decent education don’t depend on geography or race; where indigenous and non-indigenous Australians can go forward as true friends and equals. .."
    22. From Dennis Shanaha: Read here for more in The Australian

    23. "... KEVIN Rudd has had a triumph.

      As a new Prime Minister, he has tapped a vein of enthusiasm and excitement over the apology to the Stolen Generations that keeps faith with the Labor heartland, draws a clear and emotive line across the Howard era and maintains political momentum.

      Rudd is in charge of the Government, is driving the emotional national agenda and is drawing in, including and even promoting the Opposition as he attempts to take full control of national politics.

      Through imagery, action, drama and an emotion generally absent from his public face, Rudd created traffic chaos around parliament, drawing cheering crowds and inspiring a sense of national relief.

      To underscore his obsession with “promise delivery”, Rudd declared in relation to theapology: “I honour that commitment”.

      In a clever exploitation of the new politics - which is in fact non-politics - Rudd celebrated with Brendan Nelson, the Leader of the Opposition.

      To share his triumphal walk around the floor of Parliament House during an unprecedented “parliamentary pause” with Nelson and take an unprecedented Speaker’s call for the “Prime Minister and Leader ofthe Opposition” was the apogee of Rudd’s strategy of inclusion, co-operation and non-confrontation with the Opposition.

      It was an act of political theatre beyond John Howard, a strict parliamentarian, and demonstrated Rudd’s ability to break new ground in capturing the popular and emotional high ground, as well as political momentum.

      As part of the thrust to take hold of the entire political debate, Rudd has gone beyond the bare protocols of consulting an Opposition leader.

      Yesterday we saw an invitation to join a “war cabinet” on indigenous children and bipartisan support for the Howard government Northern Territory intervention.

      At the beginning of the week, there were special briefings on East Timor, last week there was the involvement in the preparations for the apology, and before that an invitation for Nelson to take part in the 2020 ideas summit.

      The “inclusive” nature of Rudd’s approach suits the Liberal leader’s tactic in the new political landscape, as he avoids unnecessary confrontation.

      Nelson’s speech in parliament, a difficult task delivered well, mindful of those who disagree with an apology, was made easier by Rudd’s approach.

      Yet the Coalition’s backing gave Rudd’s apology the unanimous and historic endorsement he wanted but which wasn’t actually there.

      Rudd delivered for Nelson, but Nelson delivered for Rudd.

      It is, so far, a symbiotic relationship unlike any leadership pairing before it.

      Their styles are similar, their commitment to inclusion and co-operation after public disenchantment with confrontation is a matter of faith and their aim, to win the next election, is the same.

      The contest is in whether Rudd emerges as an all-encompassing figure or Nelson uses consultation and co-operation to change the electorate’s mind about the Coalition..."