Malaysian Malay Rulers are Constitutional Monarchs. They Should NOT Engage Themselves in the Politics of the State. The Selangor Sultan Must Set a Good Example of a Constitutional Monarch in Dealing with the Rakyat's Representatives.

WE SAY,

THE  RECENT APPARENT STAND-OFF BETWEEN THE RAKYAT'S REPRESENTATIVES IN SELANGOR AND THE ROYAL PALACE IS UNTENABLE IN OUR CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY SYSTEM. 

IN OUR FORM OF DEMOCRACY, THE WILL OF THE RAKYAT  EXPRESSED  THROUGH ITS REPRESENTATIVES IN MATTERS OF THE RUNNING OF THE GOVERNMENT REMAINS PARAMOUNT. 

THE MENTERI BESAR IS THE ELECTED HEAD OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE RAKYAT.   HE REPRESENTS THE WILL OF THE RAKYAT, WHICH IS  TO BE RESPECTED BY ALL, INCLUDING THE  CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHS

UNLESS THERE ARE REASONS THAT AFFAIRS OF THE STATE WILL COMPROMISE THE WELL-BEING OF THE RAKYAT,  THE ROLE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCH IS TO SUPPORT AND FACILITATE THE  HEAD OF GOVERNMENT FOR HE/SHE REPRESENTS THE WILL OF THE RAKYAT, NOT TO CREATE DISSENT AND OBSTACLES.

AS SUCH,  INDIVIDUAL AND PERSONAL WHIMS AND FANCIES OF  CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHS SHOULD NOT BRING TO BEAR ON  AFFAIRS OF GOVERNMENT, MORE SO IN THE COMPOSITION OF THE RAKYAT'S REPRESENTATIVES TO RUN THE GOVERNMENT

THUS, IT  DOES NOT DO ANY FAVOURS TO THE INSTITUTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY IF THE ELECTED HEAD OF GOVERNMENT IS CONSISTENTLY BEING EMBARRASSED BY THE ROYAL PALACE AND MADE TO LOOK SUBSERVIENT TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHS IN MATTERS OF RUNNING OF THE  GOVERNMENT.

Selangor exco saga - a tale with several twists

 READ HERE FOR MORE

 The  constitutional amendments that were passed in 1983 had actually removed whatever discretionary power the sultans had hitherto enjoyed in matters to do with the selection of the MB and the appointment of the state cabinet.

After those amendments were passed, state rulers were bound to accept the advice of the MB, loath as they sometimes are to do so.

The amendments had divested the rulers of their discretionary power, making the advice of the executive well-nigh irresistible.

But things THESE DAYS  are a long way removed from the 1980s when Umno was monarch of all it surveyed in the political realm.

Constitutional pundits were left scratching their heads as to how matters with respect to the selection and swearing-in of the exco could be as protracted as the Selangor saga turned out to be.

After the constitutional crisis in Perak in early 2009 when Umno-BN enjoyed royal favour in deposing the Pakatan government of Mohd Nizar Jamaluddin, the rulers began to claw back the powers and influence they had enjoyed prior to their 1983 decimation.

The exco saga in Selangor the past four weeks was played out against this backdrop of royals seeking to push back at the Umno-engineered limits placed on them by the 1983 amendments.

 Thus Pakatan MB-designate Khalid Ibrahim, days before he took the oath of office as MB on May 14, was subjected to the embarrassment of having a letter read out in his presence that was written by the Selangor PKR secretary to the sultan which not-so-subtly undermined Khalid's claims to a second term of office.

Senior state civil servants, known to be proxies of Umno, were present while the letter was read out at a royal audience, causing Khalid no small chagrin.

 Meanwhile, putting aside his pique at having elements in his own party deal him a low blow at a royal audience, Khalid kept his cool and continued the palaver with the sultan on the overall composition of the state cabinet, pirouetting within the narrow confines imposed by the sultan's insistence on the ratio of Malays to non-Malays (variously reported to be seven Malays to three non-Malays and, latter, six to four) and the advice of his own party that, pace the 1983 amendments, the constitution allowed the MB upper hand in the matter.

Despite two demonstrations by PKR adviser Anwar Ibrahim on how he, when he was deputy prime minister, had convinced rulers to abide by the advice of the executive in precisely such matters as the composition of the state exco, Khalid, either because of a lack of skill or a paucity of nerve, was unable to shift the sultan.

Further, his attempt to have Dr Xavier Jeyakumar retained in the PKR trio of exco members for the 2013-2018 term was shot down by the sultan who apparently revealed that he was deluged with letters and petitions from PKR types about the dentist's shortcomings.Khalid demurred that the claims against Jeyakumar were unproven allegations and, therefore, should not be held against the man. Khalid's pleas turned out to be unavailing.

Now party supremo Anwar is preparing to lead a PKR delegation for a requested audience with the sultan, presumably to discuss palace-to-party relations.

Perhaps what would be more useful to PKR would be an internal party seminar on the true import of the 1983 constitutional amendments and on how party functionaries could avoid undermining each other.

- Malaysiakini

Why is the Selangor Sultan, being a Constitutional Ruler, INTERFERING in the State Politics of Selangor by INSISTING ON THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE EXCO ?

Read  here

The Selangor sultan had  insisted that six out of the 10 exco members be Malays.



A malaysiakini reader wrote:

"Someone please advice the sultan that he is a constituitional monarch with no powers to select the exco members. The sultan has to accept what is chosen by the M.B. The blame should be on the weak M.B Never in the history of B.N's rule has a sultan insist on the composition of the excos. This is history in the making."

Another reader wrote:

"The Agong does not advice the PM on his cabinet composition... he just accepts the PM selection!!! Why is the Selangor Sultan insisting on this and that...!!! All Sultans are the heads of Islam in their respective states...or is it not true? Where are we headed?"

Malaysiakini  reports

DAP and PKR will be allocated three seats each in the Selangor state executive council while PAS will be given four in keeping with the Selangor sultan's insistence that six out of the 10 exco members be Malays.

Sources in Selangor Pakatan Rakyat told Malaysiakini that the 6:4 ratio meant DAP could not be allocated four exco positions as previously agreed, for all its appointments would be non-Malays and therefore leave no room for a non-Malay appointment from PKR.

"This comes despite a last ditch appeal by the menteri besar," said a Pakatan leader who did not want to be named.

Selangor Menteri Besar Abdul Khalid Ibrahim met with the state ruler on Monday to seek the royal consent for the new exco line-up.

All 10 exco members will be sworn in at the Istana Alam Shah in Klang tomorrow morning.

The positions of state assembly speaker and deputy speaker will be given to DAP and PKR respectively as PAS already has the highest number of exco posts.

"CHINESE TSUNAMI" WAS A LIE BY UMNO-BN AND PRIME MINISTER NAJIB

Read here for MORE

Pakatan Rakyat (PR) won in 59 mixed-race federal seats, almost double its 30 wins in Chinese-majority seats in Malaysia’s Election 2013, according to a new research, debunking Barisan Nasional’s (BN) claim of a “Chinese Tsunami” that cost it more losses.

Independent online research house PoliTweet.org also said the ruling BN gained most of its votes from rural federal seats while PR increased its support from urban and semi-urban areas in the South-east Asian nation chasing developed nation status by 2020.

“BN represents the rural majority and can retain power with rural and semi-urban seats alone. This election highlighted PR’s weak areas which are rural seats, Bumiputra Sabah majority and Bumiputra Sarawak majority seats,” said the report, which can be found on PoliTweet’s official blog.

According to PoliTweet, 108 out of the 133 seats (81 per cent) won by BN came from rural seats, while PR won urban or semi-urban seats with almost the same percentage (72 out of 89 seats).

PR won all 16 urban Chinese-majority seats, 12 urban Malay seats and12 urban mixed seats, giving them 40 out of the total 43 urban seats (93 per cent). In comparison, BN only won four urban Malay and one urban mixed seats.

Out of the 54 semi-urban seats, PR won 34 of them (63 per cent). BN won the rest of the semi-urban seats, with Malay semi-urban areas making the bulk of it at 12 seats.

PoliTweet also pointed out that PR had won more urban and semi-urban Malay-majority seats than BN, effectively making Malay-majority seats no longer a guaranteed win for BN.

For its research, PoliTweet categorised seats into three categories which do not follow Election Commission’s (EC) own classification, but rather were based on Google maps satellite imagery and EC’s maps.

PoliTweet defined “rural” areas as those containing villages, small towns or farmlands, and tend to be physically large with a low population. “Urban” areas are cities covered by some form of urban development. “Semi-urban” areas are a mix of the two.

Under the three categories, PoliTweet grouped 125 seats as rural, 54 as semi-urban, and 43 as urban.

Urban areas made up slightly more than half of Chinese-majority seats, but Malay-majority seats are still predominantly rural. There are however more Malay-majority semi-urban seats than Chinese-majority and mixed areas added together.

The research house also highlighted the low probability of BN regaining urban seats, as BN obtained only 47 per cent of popular vote in semi-urban seats and 36 per cent in urban seats, compared to the 57 per cent it had amassed in rural seats.

The last Population and Housing Census in 2010 showed that urban population in Malaysia has been on a steady increase since the 1960’s, with 71 per cent of Malaysians living in urban areas. The World Bank put the number slightly higher at 72 per cent.

Federal Territories Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya both have reached 100 per cent urbanisation, while Selangor and Pulau Pinang – both currently ruled by PR – are the next highest with over 90 per cent of urbanisation.

Coincidentally, Selangor was the most populous state with 5.46 million people living in it, and together with Putrajaya, had the highest growth rates in Malaysia caused by migration and work opportunities.

In a forum organised by Universiti Malaya Centre of Democracy and Election (UMCEDEL) last week, independent pollster Merdeka Centre noted that voters were obviously split between different classes, with the working and lower-income classes mostly voting for BN, and the middle and upper classes for PR.

Pointing towards intra-ethnic differences, Merdeka Centre director Ibrahim Suffian suggested that the votes were not split according to races but more towards the different ideologies presented by both BN and PR.

MALAYSIA CANNOT GET A DUMBER CANDIDATE AS HOME MINISTER AS THIS ONE

Digest this and think about it: Who won GE-13?

It could have  gone Pakatan’ Rakyat’s way in the last General Elections. 

Can someone out in cyberspace explain this to me since I am wondering what the Election Commission did between 11.00 pm on May 5 and around 1 am on May 6 when the EC Chairman announced the results that the Barisan Nasional was the first to obtain 112 seats in Parliament. 

I watched him on NTV7 and his body language gave him away. Obviously he had done a good job for Barisan Nasional.

–Din Merican

http://dinmerican.wordpress.com/2013/05/14/digest-this-and-think-about-it-who-won-ge-13/

BN HAS NO POLITICAL LEGITIMACY TO BE IN GOVERNMENT

BN is effectively a minority government

 by

Tommy Thomas

( Lawyer)

  In assessing the results of the long-awaited 13th general elections, it is imperative that one considers the actual conditions under which the elections were conducted.

Uninformed observers, particularly from overseas, assume that because Malaysia has a Westminister-style parliamentary democracy, our elections are conducted freely, fairly and in the spirit of fair play.

The reality is that our elections are never held as they are in mature democracies like the United Kingdom, India or Australia.

They are rather akin to another Commonwealth country, Zimbabwe, where Robert Mugabe has been in power for some 33 years, and where the ruling party always wins because it thinks it has a divine right to rule, and will cheat to remain in power. Institutions intended to be independent and impartial have never acted independently and impartially.

First, the Election Commission (EC). It does not even give the semblance of being an independent umpire in a contest between two coalitions.

Instead, the EC has been most partisan, always favouring the ruling BN. Bridget Welsh, a well-respected and independent scholar, highlighted in Malaysiakini, the impact of the increased numbers in the electoral roll which were out of line with historical patterns of voter registration.

As examples, she referred to the 21 percent increase in Bachok and 29 percent in Bukit Gantang. Apart from irregularities concerning early and postal voting of some 240,000 voters, double voting and phantom voting have also allegedly took place. Many others have already written about these flaws in the voting process.

Secondly, in appearing to uphold law and order, the police force had been equally partisan, and reportedly going to the extent of transporting and protecting newly-arrived ballot boxes which contained sufficient votes to tip the balance in favour of BN in closely contested seats.

When Malaysian voters attempted to ensure that nothing untoward like that would happen, the police brought in FRU trucks with heavily-armed police ready to intimidate civilians attempting to prevent abuse.

Thirdly, the mainstream media's sole function has been to print lies and distortions while not giving any mention to any good point that Pakatan may have made.

Fourthly, the caretaker government gave out money and other gifts which, by any yardstick, would constitute bribes and electoral offences. Yet, nothing was done to stop them.

Finally, and perhaps the worst offence committed by BN, with total complicity by EC, was allowing foreigners to vote.

In every nation, only citizens enjoy the privilege of voting in national elections. It is part of nationhood and citizenship. Article 119 (1) of the federal constitution confines the right to vote to citizens, and they further have to comply with residential and registration requirements. Yet, foreigners were allowed to vote in the thousands.

A stolen election

The scandal involving planeloads arriving in Malaysia days before polling has not been credibly answered. One wonders whether any other ruling party in the world will go to the extent of what BN has done. Mugabe may have to copy BN in this trick. All those who participated in this unconstitutional and wholly unacceptable conduct are guilty of treachery and treason.

Most Malaysians knew that this election would be stolen. That is exactly what happened on Sunday, May 5 between 5pm when the polls closed and when the results were announced.

The BN game-plan was to focus on about 30 parliamentary states. Winning them at all costs would ensure a return of power. Thus, they were not interested in Karpal Singh's seat in Bukit Gelugor which he won by 42,000 votes or Seputeh where Teresa Kok increased her formidable majority to 61,000 seats.

Rather, the focus was on closely contested seats. In these seats, recounts were ordered, which invariably resulted in BN victories. The results were announced very late. There was always a break in the chain of evidence, that is, between the sealing of the ballot boxes after counting in the voting centres, and the subsequent recounts and final announcement of results seven or eight hours later.

With the benefit of hindsight, it becomes clear why in the last week before the elections when all the evidence suggested a surge for Pakatan, the Umno "war room" was confident of winning 140 to 150 seats: they had "insider information" about cheating. The evidence is slowly being uncovered and no doubt by the time these results are challenged in court in the coming weeks, the picture would be much clearer.

An analogy would be a 100-metre race where the BN runner is wearing the best track suit while the legs of his Pakatan rival tied together. The starter, the official at the tape, the track announcer and the final appeal tribunal are all BN-friendly. What would be the outcome of that race?

It is against these absolutely lop-sided voting conditions that one must at once congratulate the people of Malaysia for voting in such large numbers to ensure a magnificent performance by Pakatan against all odds.

Massive gerrymandering 

Even when the results were officially announced by EC, there was discrepancy. The first announcements in the evening of May 5 placed the total national voter turnout at around the 80% mark. The EC subsequently announced on May 6 that it was at 84.84%, a significant increase.

Does the 4% increase represent phantom voters? Set out below is a table that has been compiled from election data published on the EC website.



On the assumption that the information provided by EC is reliable and trustworthy, the critical facts that emerge on our parliamentary elections are as follows:

1. Of the record-breaking voter turnout of 84.84% resulting in 11,257,147 votes being cast nationwide, Pakatan secured 50.85% while BN received 46.87%. Pakatan received 361,101 more votes than BN in the entire country.

2. Pakatan's margin of victory is more impressive if one considers the result in peninsular Malaysia. Pakatan received 53.26% of the popular vote, while BN had 45.55%. Pakatan received 688,288 more votes than BN. Yet it won five seats less than BN for Parliament.

3. Pakatan's best performances were in Penang (67.77%), Kuala Lumpur (64.65%) and Selangor (59.36%). BN did best in Sarawak (58.26%), Perlis (55.39%) and Pahang (55.18%). The two seats in Putrajaya and Labuan have been disregarded for this purpose.

4. Kelantan and Terengganu are states in the Malay hinterland. Malay voters constitute at least 90% of the electorate in each state. BN secured 51.42% in Terengganu and 46.24% in Kelantan. 48.47% of the voters in Terengganu supported Pakatan, while 53.7% of Kelantan voted for Pakatan.

This is the best proof that BN was telling another of its big lies when it described Sunday's result as a "Chinese tsunami". The plain and obvious fact is Pakatan could not have received a total of 5.62 million votes nationwide if only the Chinese had supported them. Instead, substantial numbers of Malays, Indians, Kadazans and Dayaks voted for Pakatan.

5. Perak has an interesting story of its own. For the parliamentary seats, Pakatan received 54.48% of the votes while BN received 44.71%. Thus, Pakatan received 111,893 more votes than BN.

For the state elections, Pakatan also received 54.48% of the votes, while BN received 44.4%. The votes cast were 625,710 for Pakatan and 506,947 for BN. Hence, Pakatan had a wide margin of 118,763 state votes over BN.

Yet BN formed the state government winning 31 seats to Pakatan's 28 seats. Only a combination of gerrymandering and outright cheating caused this massive imbalance.

On these facts, an objective case can be made that the BN federal government does not enjoy political legitimacy. It did not secure the mandate of the majority. It is a minority government insofar as public support is concerned.

It is only because of massive gerrymandering that BN has majority representation in the Dewan Rakyat, enabling it to form the federal government. If 25 to 30 of the results are declared void, and by-elections follow in a free and fair manner, the BN government may fall.

When the institutions which were intended to give sanctity to the voters in their once in a five-year opportunity to decide on their government failed disastrously, public confidence was shattered, both in the newly elected government, and in the institutions which allowed this to happen. This is Malaysia's tragedy, and an awakening.

Two final comments

One needs more time to reflect upon Sunday's events and their aftermath. Two comments can nonetheless be immediately be made.

In the second decade of the 21st century, it is difficult to believe that there are politicians in any part of the globe who question and insult the world's great religions and the contents of the Holy Books, who call for such books to be burnt and for places of worship to be destroyed.

Those were the hallmarks of the Nazi regime in 1930s. The declaration of the Atlantic Charter of Four Freedoms (freedom of speech and expression, freedom of religion, freedom from want, and freedom from fear), the establishment of the United Nations and the UN Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, were intended to make these terrible deeds a thing of the past.

When Malaya obtained Merdeka in 1957, our federal constitution expressly stated that freedom of religion is an entrenched, inalienable and fundamental right.

Yet in the months leading up to last weekend's elections, Umno's propaganda tool, Utusan Malaysia gave such pronouncements by the likes of Ibrahim Ali wide and extensive publicity. They were also selected to run as candidates.

One hopes that with the decisive defeats of Perkasa leaders Ibrahim Ali and Zulkifli Noordin, Umno will respect the will of the electorate and cease such abominable conduct. Umno must recognise that we are a moderate, tolerant people who accept plurality and diversity.

Secondly, the youth of Malaysia must not lose heart or give up hope. Those in the country must continue to engage in the reform movement. Wednesday night's mammoth rally was dominated by youths of all races. The experience was exhilarating.

The Global Bersih campaign opened the eyes of many Malaysians abroad. Millions of them are active in the social media. Thousands of them returned home to vote. You are our best and the brightest. You have the world at your feet. Your talents, intelligence and industry are recognised worldwide. You must not give up on Malaysia.

Stay steadfast for Malaysia. We need you to defeat BN at the earliest opportunity.

---

TOMMY THOMAS is a lawyer who had the privilege of being in Kelana Jaya stadium along with 100,000 fellow Malaysians demanding free and fair election results. Apparently, another 100,000 just could not get in.

Pengundi Cina BUKAN rasis; Ini Buktinya

PRU13: Pengundi Cina BUKAN rasis; INI BUKTINYA

oleh

Majdan Dagang

Baca disini: http://tinyurl.com/bmmm855

Tuduhan bahawa orang Cina rasis, tidak mengenang budi, dan ingin jadi PM, TIDAK BENAR DAN TIDAK TEPAT SAMA SEKALI.

Tuduhan-tuduhan ini hanyalah andaian TANPA berdasarkan fakta yang sebenar.

Adalah dibimbangi tuduhan ini BERTUJUAN MENCETUSKAN KEGELISAHAN DALAM KALANGAN ORANG MELAYU khususnya Melayu luar bandar agar terus berpaut pada Umno walaupun mereka terus-terusan menjadi mangsa kerakusan pimpinannya merompak hasil negara.

Umno juga sedar bahawa kemenangan mereka pada kali ini banyak bersandarkan kelompok Melayu ini. Jadi mereka akan berbuat apa-apa sahaja agar kumpulan ini terus kekal walaupun terpaksa meniupkan isu perkauman.

Namun, jika penyokong Umno RAJIN SEDIKIT membuat kajian mereka akan mendapati bahawa kenyataan pimpinan mereka tentang masyarakat Cina meleset sama sekali.

Selepas meneliti keputusan PRU13 ini, saya mendapati dengan jelas bahawa orang Cina bukanlah memenangkan DAP kerana parti itu berasaskan Cina, tetapi UNDI MEREKA KERANA MENOLAK BARISAN NASIONAL KESELUROHANNYA. .

Tambahan pula, mana-mana kawasan yang mempunyai MAJORITI penduduk Cina atau sekurang-kurangnya 40 peratus pengundi Cina, calonnya daripada Pakatan Rakyat akan menang selesa – TIDAK KIRALAH CALON ITU DARI MELAYU, CINA, MAHUPUN INDIA.

Antara kawasan yang mempunyai pola sedemikian ialah bagi:


(a) P48 Bukit Bendera, Pulau Pinang.

Pecahan pengundi mengikut kaum bagi kawasan ini ialah:

- Melayu (13.99 %),
-- Cina (73.74 %),
--India (11.22 %)
--dan lain-lain (1.14 %).

Parlimen ini dimenangi oleh Zairil Khir Johari yang berbangsa Melayu mengalahkan Teh Leong Meng yang berbangsa Cina.

Secara logiknya, Zairil Khir Johari boleh kalah teruk tetapi menang dengan majoriti 32,778.


(b) P80 Raub, Pahang.

Pecahan pengundi mengikut kaum ialah
Melayu (48.93 %),
-- Cina (40.99 %),
--India (6.60 %), dan
--lain-lain (3.47 %).

Parlimen Raub ini dimenangi oleh Datuk Arif Sabri Abdul Aziz yang berbangsa Melayu mengalahkan Hoh Khai Mun yang berbangsa Cina dengan majoriti 2,814 undi.

Pada PRU12 yang lalu Ng Yen Yen mengalahkan calon Melayu dengan majoriti 2752 undi. Pada kali ini berlaku sebaliknya.


(c) P100 Pandan.

Pecahan pengundi di kawasan ini asalnya Melayu adalah majoriti. Ketika itu Datuk Ong Tee Kiat berbangsa Cina telah menang selesa.
Namun pada PRU13 ini majoriti pengundi adalah Cina.

Pecahan mengikut kaum ialah
--Melayu (44.36 %),
--Cina (48.14 %),
--India (6.60 %)
--dan lain-lain (0.9 %).

Mohd Rafizi berbangsa Melayu menewaskan Lim Chin Yee dan Tan Yew Leng yang berbangsa Cina dengan majoriti 26,729 undi!


(d) N30 Mentakab, Pahang

Calon Melayu, Tengku Zulpuri Shah Raja Puji menewaskan penyandang kerusi ini yang berbangsa Cina iaitu Datuk Chuah Boon Seong dengan majoriti 1,554 undi.

Pada PRU12, Datuk Chuah menang dengan majoriti 2,439 undi. Pecahan pengundi bagi kawasan ini ialah

--Melayu (50.94 %)
--Cina (40.95 %),
--India (5.92 %)
--dan lain-lain (2.19 %).


(e) DUN N13 Sungai Abong, Bakri, Johor.

Calon PAS, Dr Sheikh Ibrahim Salleh berjaya mengekalkan kerusi yang dimenanginya pada PRU12 lalu.

Majoritinya turut bertambah dari 1,550 pada PRU12 kepada 3,813 pada PRU13.

Pecahan pengundi bagi DUN ini ialah:
--Melayu (51.33 %),
--Cina (45.22 %),
--India (2.96 %)
--dan lain-lain (0.48 %).


(f) N15 Maharani.

Calon PAS, Dr Mohammad Taslim juga telah mengekalkan kerusi yang dimenangi pada PRU12 dan menambahkan majoritinya daripada 158 pada PRU12 kepada 3,136 pada PRU13.

Pecahan pengundi mengikut kaum bagi kawasan ini ialah
--Melayu (54.98 %),
--Cina (41.98 %),
--India (2.50 %)
--dan lain-lain (0.54 %).


(g)N21 Parit Yaani
Calon PAS, Aminolhuda Hassan berbangsa Melayu telah merampas kerusi ini daripada calon MCA Teo Yew Chuan dengan majoriti kemenangan 1,188.

Pada PRU12, MCA menang dengan majoriti 3,857 undi. Pecahan pengundi ialah
--Melayu (55.61 %),
--Cina (43.06 %),
--India (1.82 %) dan
--lain-lain (0.23 %).

Keputusan ini juga membuktikan pengundi Cina bukan rasis kerana turut memberi undi kepada PAS.


(h) N41 Puteri Wangsa
Pengundi Cina dengan jelas membuktikan bahawa kempen menakut-nakutkan mereka dengan isu hudud kurang berkesan dan orang Cina tidak rasis. Hal ini kerana calon PAS, Syed Sis Abdul Rahman menang dengan majoriti 4,469 undi.

Pecahan pengundi bagi kawasan ini ialah
-- Melayu (40.27 %),
-- Cina (47.22 %),
--India (11.79 %)
--dan lain-lain (0.73 %).

Berdasarkan fakta dan maklumat tersebut:

-- Dengan sendirinya MENYANGKAN DAKWAAN bahawa orang Cina bersikap rasis kerana memenangkan calon bangsa mereka.

-- Orang Cina bukan menolak BN atau bangsa mereka sendiri tetapi mereka menolak pemimpin dan parti yang rasuah, salah guna kuasa, rasuah dan pelbagai lagi masalah.

---Selain itu, pengundi cina juga membuktikan bahawa mereka masyarakat yang matang dan celik maklumat serta tidak mudah melatah dengan propaganda politik.

MCA telah memainkan isu satu undi untuk DAP bererti satu undi untuk PAS yang mahu mengadakan hukum hudud.

Umno juga turut menakut-nakut pengundi melalui isu ini. Walaupun ada kalangan pemimpin DAP yang tidak bersetuju dengan hasrat PAS itu, tetapi para pengundi Cina semakin hari semakin memahami apakah hukum hudud.

Buktinya, mereka telah memberi sokongan yang padu dan memberikan kemenangan bergaya kepada calon-calon PAS di kawasan lebih 40 peratus pengundi Cina.

Jika anda rajin menelaah keputusan PRU13 yang lalu, banyak lagi bukti yang menunjukkan bahawa penolakan pengundi Cina bukanlah kerana bangsa atau parti tetapi penolakan total kepada sikap parti pemerintah itu sendiri.

Salah seorang rakan saya berbangsa Cina menyatakan rasa sedihnya apabila dituduh bangsanya bersikap rasis. Bagi beliau, tuduhan itu tidak berasas sama sekali dan tidak menghormati haknya sebagai pengundi untuk membuat pilihan.

Oleh itu, sebagai rakyat Malaysia yang cintakan keamanan, keharmonian antara kaum, dan kemakmuran negara menyeru agar jangan memainkan isu-isu yang boleh mengundang kebencian antara kaum.

Marilah kita bersama menuju Malaysia baru yang saling hormat-menghormati antara kaum dan agama.

-Majdan Dagang

------------------------------------------------------------

PAS Thanks Chinese Voters for Voting in MALAY Candidates in GE 13

Read here in Malaysiakini:http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/229514


PAS has EXPRESSED GRATITUDE to Chinese voters who backed MALAY Pakatan Rakyat candidates in the recently concluded general election, even if it meant having to VOTE AGAINST A FELLOW CHINESE.

PAS information chief Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man said the action of these voters proved the claim by Umno that the Chinese had rejected the Malays to be slander.

Tuan Ibrahim said,

“The Chinese voters were willing to vote for Malay candidates without any narrow racial sentiments, as claimed by Umno.

“There are tens of Parliament and state assembly seats that were contested by Malay candidates against candidates from the Tiong Hua (Chinese), in mixed constituencies, which were won by the Malays, proving that Chinese voters were willing to reject candidates of their own race."

He said the Umno claim could also be part of efforts through the mainstream media to create a smokescreen to hide possible cheating in the election and for Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak to secure his position in Umno.

Umno, Tuan Ibrahim added, must cease “playing with fire” by using the results of the 13th general election to stoke flames of Chinese-versus-Malay sentiments, especially since this was not based on facts.

MORE MALAYS IN PARLIAMENT DUE TO PAKATAN WIN

Meanwhile, in another statement, Pahang PAS information chief Suhaimi Md Saad explained that DAP’s big win in the election did NOT lessen the number of Malay MPs in Parliament.

In fact, Suhaimi said, the success of Pakatan’s candidates only served to increase that number by seven.

He citing various examples of Malay Pakatan parliamentary and state seat candidates from PKR, DAP and PAS defeating their BN challengers, including Chinese candidates.

Among the examples given are:

1. Rafizi Ramli (PKR, right) who won against Gary Lim (BN) in Pandan;

2, Dr Siti Mariah Mahmud (PAS), who won against S Murugesan (BN) in Kota Raja;

3. Abdul Khalid Ibrahim (PKR) who won against Tan Kok Eng (BN) in Bandar Tun Razak;

4. Imran Hamid (PKR) who won against Kong Cho Ha (BN) in Lumut;

5. Mohd Arif Sabri Abdul Aziz (DAP) who won against Hoh Khai Mun (BN) in Raub;

6. Idris Ahmad (PKR) who won against K Parthiban (BN) in Ijok;

7. Tengku Zulpuri Shah Raja Puji (DAP) who won against Chuah Boon Seong (BN) in Mentakab; and

8. Mohd Rashid Hasnon (PKR) who won against Wong Mun Hoe (BN) in Pantai Jerejak.

As to how former Johor Menteri Besar Abdul Ghani Othman could to lose to DAP supremo Lim Kit Siang (left) in Gelang Patah, Johor, Suhaimi said GHANI HIMSELF “lLOOKED FOR TROUBLE , by choosing to contest in a Chinese-majority seat within a constituency that used to be “owned” by MCA.

To further debunk Umno’s claim that non-Malays went against Malays in the ballot box, he further cited 13 examples of seats where NON -Malay BN candidates WON in MALAY-MAJORITY constituencies.

Among the constituencies listed in Suhaimi's statement are -

-- Simpang Renggam (57 percent Malays),

--Tanjung Piai (51 percent),

-- Batu Sapi (51 percent),

-- Gurun (57 percent) and

--Kahang (74 percent).

LIVE REPORTS....5 May 2013: TODAY MALAYSIANS DECIDE THE DESTINY OF THEIR FUTURE GENERATIONS

COUNTING HAS BEGUN...
---------------------

Kelantan leads the way with a turnout of 62.02 percent as at NOON.

It is followed by

 Kedah (61.88%), 

Terengganu (60.9%),

 Johor (60.01%),

 Perlis (59.27%), 

Penang (59.04%),

 Pahang (59.02%),

 Selangor (58.9%), 

Negri Sembilan (58.35%), 

Sarawak (58.26%), 

Perak (58.08%) 

Sabah (57.1%), 

Putrajaya (55.82%), 

Malacca (55.67%) and

 Labuan (45.82%).

3.30pm: Segamat, Johor: PKR claims that its agent was told to leave a polling station in Felda Palong Timur after discovering that voting was being conducted in a disorderly manner there.

"Our officer was  told that his duty was done there and he should leave," says media officer Ong Jing Cheng.

"We were informed that the EC officers there did not print out the electoral roll and only recorded voter's information from the computer on a piece of paper with the 1Malaysia logo."

The polling station is Palong Timur 140/01/03 at SK Palong Timur 1.

PKR is mobilising its people to put pressure on the polling station which is 40km from town, deep within an oil palm plantation.

3pm: Penang - The DAP's Tanjong candidate Ng Wei Aik has lodged a report with the EC because ballot papers were not stamped with the official stamp.

Ng, who is the Penang DAP secretary, said complaints were received from three locations or polling centres:

- SJK(T)) Jalan Sungai (under the Jelutong parliament constituency)

- SJK(C) kong Min Cawangan Kedua (under the Bukit Gelugor constituency) and

- SK Taman Sejahtera under the Bukit Mertajam constituency.

Penang EC deputy director Mohd Faiz Syazwan Zainal Abidin says some ballot papers were not stamped due to the "negligence" of some officers.

"Whether stamped or not, we will accept the papers as it is according to the EC regulations," he says.

-------------------------
 WEATHER FORECAST FOR TODAY (SUNDAY)
 The Malaysian Meteorological Department has forecast that there will be no rain in the morning today in most states while some will have overcast skies.The states are Perlis, Kedah, Kelantan, Terengganu, Penang, Selangor, Negeri Sembilan, Malacca and the Federal Territories.

However, there will be rain in the morning in some areas in Perak, Pahang, Sabah and Sarawak.

 "This weather forecast is only a guideline for voters. They are encouraged to come out early to vote as some areas will experience rain and thunderstorm in the evening," said the department. http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/229160

THE REASONS WHY MALAYSIANS MUST VOTE FOR CHANGE ON 5 MAY 2013

Why We MUST Vote for CHANGE... Here are the Reasons

Open Letter from Dr. Ariffin Omar 

http://aliran.com/13054.html


WE are NOW at the CROSSROADS  of our destiny.

The 13th General Elections that is slated to be held on 5 May will DECIDE ONCE AND FOR ALL what future we are going to bequeath to our children and grandchildren.

We have lived for more than half a century under a regime which practices the politics of ethnic discrimination.

In its wake this politics of apartheid has brought about corruption, mismanagement, cronyism and nepotism on a scale not seen in many countries.

I have been told that as many as 3 million Malaysians have left this nation for other countries in despair.

Can we afford such a loss?

A. WE ARE BRINK OF DISASTER

The Barisan Nasional has brought this country to the brink of disaster.

In playing its racist politics on the false claims that the underdeveloped and underprivileged Malays needed government aid through the New Economic Policy, the BN has misused and abused this policy to ENRICH CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS IN UMNO including their cronies and hangers-on.

The rights and privileges of NON -Malays as guaranteed in the Malaysian Constitution have been IGNORED.


B. DESTRUCTION OF INSTITUTIONS OF STATE

The BN has systematically destroyed the institutions of state.

1. The JUDICIARY has been emasculated and rendered subservient to the interests of the BN. Malaysians must know that hardly anyone now believes in the independence of the judiciary.

Foreign investors investing in Malaysia have demanded the right to have any legal matters arising from their business disputes to be heard either in Singapore, London or even in Hong Kong.

What is the value of our judiciary?

2. The CIVIL SERVICE is nothing but a pliant tool of the BN. The percentage of non-Malays serving in the civil service is negligible.

Why?

The BN, in particular Umno, has been consistent in making sure that it is monopolised by Malays and thus ensure that the BN’s interests and corruption are protected.

3. Even the POLICE FORCE and the army are not spared from the policy of mainly recruiting Malays into the services at the expense of non-Malays who are more than willing to serve.

This BN government has FAILED to realise that the NON -Malays played a CRUCIAL ROLE in the emergency to crush the communist insurrection. Many non-Malays gave their lives to defeat the communists especially those who served in the Special Branch many of whom were Chinese and Indians. Dayak trackers from Sarawak were also used to hunt down the communists.

Has the BN forgotten all this?

4, We must not forget how the institution of the MONARCHY was distorted and manipulated to suit the interest of the BN.

The former PM Mahathir had removed the powers of the rulers which were enshrined in the Constitution and had transferred these powers to the executive. Therefore the rulers consent was no longer necessary for any bill to become law. All that was needed was for parliament to pass the Bill again and after a period of time, the Bill becomes law even without the signature or the consent of the rulers.

Thus an important part of the process of checks and balances was removed.

5. PARLIAMENT itself has become a mere debating club WITHOUT MUCH POWER to oversee many important agencies and bodies and demand accountability.

For example:

-- The Election Commission is not responsible to Parliament but to the PM. … Parliament cannot even demand accountability from the SPRM as it is not answerable to Parliament.

--Even Petronas is not under the purview of Parliament or responsible to Parliament but to the PM.


C. DEBILITATING NATIONAL EDUCATION SYSTEM

I am no great admirer of British colonial rule, but we cannot deny that in the field of EDUCATION we inherited an educational system that was second to none in Asia.

What is the standard of our educational system TODAY?

The DPM Muhyiddin has come out with an outlandish claim that our educational system is the best in this world.

Well if that is the case WHY are the BN Ministers and Members of Parliament NOT SENDING THEIR CHILDREN TO THE LOCAL UNIVERSITIES?

From the very beginning they send their children to international schools and after that off to foreign universities where the language of education is in English.

As for us we are forced to send our children to an educational system which has neither value nor merit.

Are we surprised that none of our universities is listed in the world rankings while countries like Indonesia and Thailand, which were formerly regarded as below us, are now far ahead of us in educational standards? What has the government got to say about this?


D. RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS DISHARMONY AT ITS WORST NOW

In terms of unity we have never been so divided in our history.

There seems to be a DELIBERATE POLICY TO SET THE MALAYS AGAINST THE NON-MALAYS by using almost every conceivable excuse to provoke suspicion and tension among the various ethnic communities in Malaysia.

Issues like the ‘Allah issue’ are apparently invented to cause religious disharmony. Worse, there is latitude given to extremists to insult and denigrate other religions in Malaysia.

The dragging-of-the-cow-head incident in K.L. and the remarks made by racist Malays and some Chinese converts against other religions and beliefs are given prominence. No action is taken against these individuals for making such seditious remarks. The BN claims that is part and parcel of freedom of speech as guaranteed in the Constitution.

But the rights of other religions and beliefs that are also guaranteed in the Constitution are conveniently ignored.

The present government does not believe in unity because there has never been a consistent policy that promotes national unity.


E. HOLLOWNESS OF 1MALAYSIA CONCEPT

We have gone through the hollow slogans of ‘Bangsa Malaysia’, ‘Islam Hadari’ and now ‘1Malaysia’.

Every new PM comes with a new slogan that is either devoid of meaning or has no substance.

For example: what is this 1Malaysia when even in the BN circles the idea of 1Malaysia is not practised? In the BN, Umno reigns supreme; the MCA, the Gerakan and the MIC are handmaidens to Umno.

Now on the eve of this historic general election we can see just how hollow the 1Malaysia concept is.

Anyone can see how insignificant the MCA, the Gerakan and the MIC are in helping the BN to regain power. These parties face annihilation at the hands of the voters.

Only Umno can still count on some measure of support. Any seat allocated to these parties will be a seat that will be wrested by the opposition.

Thus Umno is in a mortal dilemma concerning what seats (if any) to give to these parties. If the 1Malaysia is an abject failure in the BN, how will it succeed in the country?


F. NO RESPECT FOR LAW AND ORDER AND BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS

This government has no respect for law and order or even for basic human rights which we are all entitled to.

As an example, when the Bersih rallies took place the BN saw it as a threat to law and order even though the rally was very peaceful.

The BN authorised the police to act harshly against those participating in the Bersih rallies. They were beaten and gassed and had water cannons turned on them. Some were arrested and charged in court for attempting to overthrow the Government or wage war against the Agong. These protestors were only armed with mineral water bottles.

When Malaysian territory in Sabah was invaded by armed intruders at Lahad Datu, the BN described these invaders as neither terrorists nor militants and attempted to negotiate a settlement.

Only after these intruders ambushed and killed Malaysian police personnel did the government classify these intruders as terrorists. Why the discrepancy in the treatment of the Bersih protesters and the armed Filipino intruders?

Even more shocking are the innumerable deaths of those detained in police lock-ups. MANY OF THESE HAPPEN TO BE INDIANS.

The causes of their deaths were never satisfactorily explained and calls for inquests and impartial postmortems are dismissed curtly by the authorities.

The issue of unexplained deaths as in the case of Teoh Boon Hock and Ahmad Sarbani are also issues that need answers.


G. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH...

Can we continue with the same state of affairs for another 55 years?

I doubt we can.


H. YOUR VOTE FOR PAKATAN RAKYAT TO GOVERN THE COUNTRY FOR THE FIRST TIME

Therefore, I appeal to you, my fellow Malaysians, to vote in the Pakatan Rakyat.

Given our record in Penang and Selangor, we can take over Putrajaya and bring about much-needed changes for the better.

a) )For starters we will reduce the price of essential items that burden the people.

b) We can and will be committed to tackling the issue of corruption. I admit that corruption can never be eliminated but at least we can minimise it as we have done in Penang.

c) We can improve the quality of education by ensuring that those appointed to work in the universities are suitably qualified and competent to teach. We will seriously take measures to improve the standard of education in Malaysian schools especially in Science and Mathematics.

d) We will seriously look into providing cheap and efficient public transport for all Malaysians. Useless projects or industries will be scrapped. My hope is that we can dismantle Proton, which is a disaster to Malaysia.

e) Even more important, we will dismantle monopolies that are being held by Umno cronies at the expenses of Malaysians. IPPs will be forced to lower rates while more affordable housing will be an important item in government planning.

f) Poverty, which is a bane in Malaysian society, will be tackled head-on not on the basis of race but on the basis of income levels and disparities. In this respect East Malaysia will be a priority area. At the same time marginalised groups such as the Indians as well as the Orang Asli will have their interests attended to.

g) Even more important, a sense of belonging to the nation will be inculcated among all Malaysians. We hope that through this we can remove the poison of racism and ethnic hostility fostered by the BN government all these 55 years.

h) Citizens who were not given their legal documents as citizens will have this injustice redressed. At the same time, foreigners who were given citizenships for the sake of political expedience by the BN will have their citizenship revoked and they will be deported to their country of origin.

It is important to stress that Malaysia belongs to MALAYSIANS.

i) Last but not least, leaders of the BN involved in massive corruption and treachery to this nation of ours will be apprehended and put on trial. Those who committed injustices against the people will not be allowed to escape with their ill-gotten gains. We will ensure that corruption is tackled head on.

j)The SPRM will be made to act as strictly as possible within the law and it should be answerable to Parliament. Similarly the Election Commission will be an independent body accountable and answerable to Parliament. It is also vital that Petronas, an important agency, be answerable and accountable to Parliament.


I. VOTE FOR CHANGE FOR THE SAKE OF YOUR FUTURE GENERATIONS

My fellow Malaysians, it is my hope that after reading this short appeal you will take the time to ponder on the all-important choice that you will have to make on 5 May 2013.

Please remember, voting for the Pakatan Rakyat is NOT just merely voting for another party.

It is voting FOR THE FUTURE WELL-BEING OF YOURSELVES, YOUR CHILDREN AND YOUR GRANDCHILDREN.

Please do NOT GAMBLE WITH THE FUTURE OF THE COMING GENERATIONS.

VOTE WISELY.

- DR ARIFFIN OMAR

The Dirty Bastards in Malaysian Politics

  

 Barisan Nasional’s (BN) “underhanded tactics” in  the Registrar of Societies (RoS) ;s decision  NOT  to recognise the DAP’s office-bearers, DAP’s Lim Guan Eng said today.

The DAP secretary-general said that the RoS decision, which was made less than three days before the nomination day on Saturday, showed that this was the “worst BN we’ve seen in history”.

“This is despicable, this is dishonourable,” a visibly upset Lim told reporters at the DAP headquarters here today.

“This is character assassination. This is political assassination. I’m very upset by these underhand tactics,” he added.

Lim said that DAP candidates would run under PAS’ full moon logo in the peninsula and PKR’s eye logo in East Malaysia in the 13th general election, if the Election Commission (EC) did not issue a letter approving DAP candidates in using their rocket logo.

“The most important letter to issue is to withdraw this letter,” he said, referring to the RoS letter dated April 17, 2013, that refused to recognise DAP’s office-bearers that were elected on December 15, 2012.

Lim said that he did not trust the EC’s verbal assurance on the DAP being able to use its rocket logo in Election 2013, pointing out that DAP candidates needed to show EC officials on nomination day a letter of authority signed by the party’s secretary-general, authorising them to use the party’s logo.

“If our CEC is not recognised, we don’t have powers to issue letters of authority,” said Lim, referring to DAP’s central executive committee.

He added that legal recourse was difficult due to time constraints.

Lim, who is also the Penang caretaker chief minister, questioned how the RoS could punish the DAP when it was still in the process of investigating the opposition party’s election process.

He pointed out that the RoS had, on the same day, issued another letter requesting two DAP members to attend an inquiry on May 9.

PAS and PKR secretaries-general Datuk Mustafa Ali and Saifuddin Nasution Ismail, who were also at the press conference, said that their party leaders approved the use of their party logos by DAP candidates.
The 13th general election is touted to be the keenest election race in recent history after BN lost its two-thirds parliamentary majority in Election 2008.

The RoS ruling will likely affect DAP candidates’ chances in the 49 federal seats and slightly more than 100 state seats in the May 5 polls, as most of the contests are in Chinese-majority areas where the Rocket is popular but not the other logos.

The MCA has also frequently warned Chinese voters against supporting Pakatan Rakyat (PR), claiming that PAS would implement hudud law in the multi-racial country.

The DAP’s rocket logo was ubiquitous in Election 2008, where it contested in 149 constituencies, including 47 parliamentary seats and won 28 parliamentary seats and 63 state seats.

Nineteen of the state seats was in Penang, where it formed the PR government with PKR and PAS.

The three parties have yet to formalise the pact and are using their respective logos in the coming polls.
BN component party MCA is the immediate beneficiary of the RoS move as it has been struggling to counter DAP’s influence since Election 2008.

The Chinese party has “loaned” three federal seats to Umno to prevent a further loss of support from the Chinese community that swung against the ruling coalition in the last election.

MASSIVE ELECTORAL FRAUD BY UMNO-BN TO CHEAT MALAYSIAN VOTERS OF A GENUINE GOVERNMENT

Mahathir dah bagi MyKad free, tubuh pula cawangan UMNO Pakistan Sabah dan Pakistan Sabah Bersatu...

KEPUTUSAN UMNO Malaysia meluluskan Cawangan Pakistan Sabah Bersatu secara tergopoh-gopoh di Bahagian Silam pada 1991 menyebabkan parti terbesar di Malaysia itu menghadapi dilema kerana kemungkinan besar Presiden UMNO boleh diheret ke Panel RCI yang akan menyambung sidangnya pada 15 hingga 20 April 2013.

Sejak tertubuhnya cawangan Pakistan Sabah Bersatu, Pakistan sudah menjadi komuniti elit dalam UMNO kerana mereka mendapat kad pengenalan projek, menjadi pemilih berdaftar dan mendapat semua kemudahan yang dimiliki Orang Melayu dan Bumiputera Sabah kerana mereka dijenamakan sebagai Melayu atau Bumiputera.

Berikut adalah semakan rambang yang dilakukan terhadap cawangan berkenaan dan mendapati ahli berikut menggunakan Kad Pengenalan Palsu Yang Dibatalkan oleh Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara tetapi masih menjadi ahli UMNO sehingga ke hari ini.

01 GUL BIN WALI H0492445 Nombor Ahli : 2651446

02 SAKANDAR BIN HAMBALI H0492846 Nombor Ahli : 1599166

03 RAZAK BIN SHARI H0493836 Nombor Ahli : 2651445

04 SAHI BIN WAZIR H0493843 Nombor Ahli : 2651441

05 AMIR BIN MOHAMMAD H0494269 Nombor Ahli : 2651452

06 HALID BIN RAHMAT H0543382 Nombor Ahli : 2651426

07 TAHIR BIN MIRAHMAD SHAH H0547413 Nombor Ahli : 2651433

08 USMAN BIN ABDUL SHAKOR H0547544 Nombor Ahli : 2286128

09 RASIK BIN SUAIDI H0550087 Nombor Ahli : 1599193

10 ABDULLAH BIN MUHAMMAD H0551027 Nombor Ahli : 1599191

Agak menakjubkan juga kerana ramai ahli Cawangan Pakistan Sabah Bersatu bukan sahaja memegang kad pengenalan palsu yang tiadak dalam rekod JPN; malah turut memegang kad pengenalan yang ada dalam rekod JPN tetapi tidak merujuk kepada mereka kerana dimiliki penama lain. 

Cuba perhatikan No.KP mereka(yang berwarna merah) dalam rekod UMNO Malaysia dan No.KP dalam Rekod Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara.

Berikut adalah beberapa contoh yang ditemui;

KES PERTAMA

Rekod Umno Malaysia

Nama: ABD RAHMAN JAAFAR

N0. KP: H0577614

No. Ahli: 228613

Alamat: Taman Pertama 1, Lahad Datu.

Tarikh Lulus: 6/10/1995

Tarikh Lahir: 5/8/1955

Rekod Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara

Nama: WONG WEE CHOON @ PETER

N0. KP: H0577614 (541015-12-5175)

Alamat: Kg. Takis, Kelanahan, Pantai Manis, Papar.

Tarikh Lahir: 15/10/1954

KES KEDUA

Rekod Umno Malaysia

Nama: ABDUL KARIM BIN BAKAZEH

N0. KP: H0328016

No. Ahli: 1547464

Alamat: Peti Surat 152, Lahad Datu.

Tarikh Lulus: 5/25/1991

Tarikh Lahir: 4/9/1955

Rekod Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara

Nama: ABD AZIZ BIN SHER AZIZ KHAN

N0. KP: H0328016 (560503-12-5303)

Alamat: Bandar Lahad Datu.

Tarikh Lahir: 03/05/1956

 

KES KETIGA

Rekod Umno Malaysia

Nama: ALI BIN PARIN

N0. KP: H0465630

No. Ahli: 2009133

Alamat: Peti Surat 159, Lahad Datu.

Tarikh Lulus: 4/5/1994

Tarikh Lahir: 8/6/1965

Rekod Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara

Nama: AHAD BIN OMAR

N0. KP: H0465630 (600323-12-5545)

Alamat: Kampung Lajau, Labuan.

Tarikh Lahir: 23/03/1960

KES KEEMPAT

Rekod Umno Malaysia

Nama: AMAN BIN SALIM

N0. KP: H0463712

No. Ahli: 2286145

Alamat: Peti Surat 60694, Lahad Datu.

Tarikh Lulus: 6/10/1995

Tarikh Lahir: 6/10/1995 (Mungkin mereka silap masuk data)

Rekod Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara

Nama: CHAW KIANG POH

N0. KP: H0463712 (601129-12-5167)

Alamat: Batu 1, Jalan Segama, Lahad Datu

Tarikh Lahir: 29/11/1960

KES KELIMA

Rekod Umno Malaysia

Nama: BASNIR BIN SHIMBER KHAN

N0. KP: H0328180

No. Ahli: 1590542

Alamat: Hannie Travel Service, Lahad Datu.

Tarikh Lulus: 7/27/1991

Tarikh Lahir: 8/4/1954

Rekod Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara

Nama: MAMAND B FAZAL RAHMAN

N0. KP: H0328180

Alamat: Klias, Beaufort

Tarikh Lahir: 11/10/1956

 

KES KEENAM

Rekod Umno Malaysia

Nama: FAZALDAD BIN GULAMAD

N0. KP: H0331388

No. Ahli: 1547463

Alamat: Peti Surat 159, 91109 Lahad Datu.

Tarikh Lulus: 5/25/1991

Tarikh Lahir: 1/4/1944

Rekod Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara

Nama: ABDUL MAJID BIN AJAR KHAN

N0. KP: H0331388 (580628-12-5057)

Alamat: Felda Keratong 1, Bandar Tun Razak, Pahang

Tarikh Lahir: 28/06/1958

KES KETUJUH

Rekod Umno Malaysia

Nama: HABIB BIN MOHMAD

N0. KP: H0428424

No. Ahli: 2651455

Alamat: Peti Surat 60694, 91109 Lahad Datu.

Tarikh Lulus: 3/4/1997

Tarikh Lahir: 3/4/1997 (Mungkin mereka silap masuk data)

Rekod Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara

Nama: LESUMI BINTI SINADAU

N0. KP: H0428424 (520315-12-5086)

Alamat: Kg. Silou Gamut, Kaingaran, Tambunan

Tarikh Lahir: 15/03/1952

 

KES KEDELAPAN

Rekod Umno Malaysia

Nama: HARUN BIN BAZAR

N0. KP: H0331916

No. Ahli: 1547491

Alamat: Peti Surat 159, 91109 Lahad Datu.

Tarikh Lulus: 5/25/1991

Tarikh Lahir: 8/3/1956

Rekod Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara

Nama: ABDUL RAHMAN BIN HAKIM ROS

N0. KP: H0331916 (600115125751)

Alamat: Kg. Bingkul, Klias, Beaufort

Tarikh Lahir: 15/01/1960

KES KESEMBILAN

Rekod Umno Malaysia

Nama: WAHAJ BIN OMAR

N0. KP: H0501671

No. Ahli: 2286132

Alamat: Taman Pertama 1, Lahad Datu.

Tarikh Lulus: 6/10/1995

Tarikh Lahir: 1/1/1961

Rekod Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara

Nama: JAMDAH BT SALAMUDDIN

N0. KP: H0501671

Alamat: Batu 8, Jalan Apas, Tawau

Tarikh Lahir: 13/07/1962

BERTUAH......Warga Pakistan ini bertuah kerana telah menjadi rakyat Malaysia dan kini sedang dalam proses kelulusan setelah adik beradiknya mendapat MYKad Malaysia.

Semakan mendapati seramai 47,000 warga Pakistan TULEN yang telah diterima sebagai Ahli UMNO dan menjadi pemilih berdaftar sejak memperoleh Kad Pengenalan Projek Mahathir.
 

Mereka ini adalah GHURKA POLITIK yang dilahirkan ketika era HARRIS-MAHATHIR dan begitu dominan dalam UMNO dan sektor ekonomi (Ceti) yang menjadi bank bergerak di Sabah!

Senarai berikut sebahagian daripada mereka dan kesemua mereka adalah pemilih berdaftar. 

01. H0352002 SHER B HUNARDAD (Sembulan) 02. H0352003 ATTAS B MAHMAD (Pasir Putih) 03. H0352004 SARDAR B JAMDAD (Kota Belud) 04. H0352015 NAINA MOHD A.KADIR (Semporna) 05. H0352016 ABD MAJID B BATHUSA (Sembulan) 06. H0352020 SAHUL HAMED RAHMATULLAH (Sembulan) 07. H0352021 MOHD ALI B JAMAL MOHAMAD (Sim-Sim, Sandakan) 08. H0352029 HASAN B AHADAD(Kota Belud) 09. H0352030 FAQIR B ISLAM (Petagas) 10. H0352044 FARMAN B ABDUL GANI (Likas) 11. H0352052 AMIT KHAN B SHAH (Klias Baru) 12. H0352057 FAIZAL B AFZAL (Kunak) 13. H0352060 AZIZULLAH B AHMAD (Beaufort) 14. H0352062 SIRAJ B ABD RAHMAN (Lahad Datu) 15. H0352079 MION HUSSAIN ZAID HAKIM SHAH (Kunak) 16. H0352107 FAZAL B IMRAN (Bundu Tuhan) 17. H0352116 FAKIR GULAM KASHMIR (Petagas) 18. H0352119 BAHADER SHER ALODIN (Beaufort) 19. H0352123 SIRAJ B SHAMANO (Klias Baru) 20. H0352149 MARAJ B HAZRAJ (Semporna) 21. H0352150 ALI B BAZIR (Petagas) 22. H0352159 SAID MOHD SHARIF (Kalabakan) 23. H0352174 THILSHAT BT KADIR SULTAN (Sembulan) 24. H0352175 MOHD YARUSAI B IBRAHIM (Sembulan) 25. H0352187 FARIQ B MAHMOOD (Likas) 26. H0352190 ASFHAR B AMIR (Tanjong Batu, Tawau) 27. H0352193 HAMMATHU SHAIK MOHAMAD (Petagas) 28. H0364044 MUNAVAR B ABD MAJEED (Kota Belud) 29. H0364063 RAFIK B SHAIK MOHAMAD (Kota Belud) 30. H0364072 MUHAMMAD FAIZAL SUWANDI (Kota Belud) 31. H0364074 HAJILA B HASARAT (Kota Belud) 32. H0364088 SHAIK MOHAMAD MOHD SAHRIF (Kota Belud) 33. H0364093 GULAM MOHD MUSTAFA  (Likas) 34. H0364171 NAZEER AHMAD KAMAL BATCHA (Kota Belud) 35. H0480177 MINHAJ B SHIRI (Lahad Datu) 36. H0480178 MOHD NAINA B MOHD KASIM (Likas) 37. H0480184 NADIM B BAZ (Klias, Beaufort) 38. H0480204 BENJAR B BANGONDOL (Beaufort) 39. H0480247 MOHD IQBAL DAWOOD (Putatan) 40. H0480265 RIAZUDIN B MOHAMAD HANIEF (Kota Belud) 41. H0480314 SIRAZ B ARAKAT (Likas) 42. H0480327 HABED B WAHAB (Beaufort) 43. H0480330 DOST MOHAMMAD MIYA MOHAMMAD (Beaufort) 44. H0480333 AMIL SHAD B LALBAZ (Likas) 45. H0480334 FAZIR KARIM B AWAN DAL (Klias Baru, Beaufort) 46. H0480341 BAHADAR B SAID (Klias Baru, Beaufort) 47. H0480349 GULROZ B NAMROZ (Likas) 48. H0480352 USMAN B GULL (Sembulan) 49. H0480358 NIRHADE @ MIRHADZ B WALI (Likas) 50. H0480366 MOHD ZAUDIN ABD GAFFOR (Lahad Datu) 51. H0480371 MOHD KARIM B HAKIMSHA (Lahad Datu) 52. H0480372 SHAREEF B KHALID (Kunak) 53. H0480421 GUL SHER B ABDUL AZIZ (Kota Belud) 54. H0480458 ISLAM SHAH B MOHD ISA (Likas) 55. H0480459 ABSAR KHAN B MIRAYAKHAN (Kota Belud) 56. H0480460 ABDUL ZALEEL B ABDUL (Tg. Aru, Kota Kinabalu) 57. H0480463 MOHD IKBAR B LIAS (Likas) 58. H0480688 UMARGUL B HASRATLLAH (Kinarut, Papar) 59. H0480691 ZAMAN B ABDUL OMAR (Kinarut, Papar) 60. H0481000 HAJA B PAKIR MOHAMED (Kota Belud) 61. H0481038 RAZIK B GULL (Sembulan) 62. H0481043 BADURZAMAN B ALIYAR (Beaufort) 63. H0481147 MOIDEEN B MOHAMAD (Tg.Aru, Kota Kinabalu) 64. H0481170 ABU MASYKUR B ARIFIN (Semporna) 65. H0481173 FAZAL WAHAB B MOHD SADIQ (Beaufort) 66. H0481240 VARUSAI MOHAMAD ABU BAKAR (Sandakan) 67. H0481241 SABIR AHMAD B SULAIMAN (Likas) 68. H0481243 RAKMATULLA B KHAWAS (Likas) 69. H0481258 SAHUL B MAJID (Likas) 70. H0481272 RAHAM B GULAM (Beaufort) 71. H0481282 SALIM KHAN B KABOR (Likas) 72. H0481312 NASRAN B RUSAL (Tg. Kapor, Kudat) 73. H0481344 YOUSOF B MAIDIN (Tuaran) 74. H0481367 SAHID B HAMID (Pulau Gaya, Kota Kinabalu) 75. H0481368 NAJEEB B SALMAN (Tuaran) 76. H0481380 FAZAL B MAHAMAD (Petagas) 77. H0481672 AZAD GUL B AMIR KHAN (Kota Kinabalu) 78. H0481673 ANWAR B SULTAN (Beaufort) 79. H0481679 SHARIF B TANZARY (Buang Sayang, Papar) 80. H0481680 AMIR GUL B HAYAT (Buang Sayang, Papar) 81. H0481714 SAHAD B GULAM (Buang Sayang, Papar) 82. H0481767 SHIRULLAH B TANZARI (Buang Sayang, Papar) 83. H0481782 HAMEED B KADAR (Petagas) 84. H0481910 GUL B FRUSH (Kapayan, Kota Kinabalu) 85. H0481911 JESHARI B ESMAIL (Sembulan, Kota Kinabalu) 86. H0482560 HIDAYAT B SHAIK MOHD (Likas) 87. H0482562 MOHD HAKIM B GULZAR (Beaufort) 88. H0482567 SADDAM B KAMAL (Klias Baru, Beaufort) 89. H0482973 MOHD YUSUF B GUL SAL (Tuaran) 90. H0483142 SHAIK ABDULLAH B SUNIMOHD (Kota Kinabalu) 91. H0483219 NIZAM MAIDEEN ABDUL KARIM (Kota Belud) 92. H0483297 MUSAFAR B SHERIN MUSAFAR (Petagas) 93. H0483298 NAVIR B HAMID (Likas) 94. H0483332 WAZIR B SHERIN (Likas) 95. H0483343 ALI B BASHIR (Beaufort) 96. H0483350 ALAMBIR B ZAINUL ABIDIN (Likas) 97. H0483424 AKTIR B SHAHDID (Kimanis, Papar) 98. H0483491 MOHD SAHRIF B KUTHUDEEN (Sembulan) 99. H0483538 GHULAM B MUSA (Sipitang) 100. H0483578 AMIR RAHMAN FAZAL RAHMAN (Buang Sayang) 101. H0483635 FARUK B RAJ MOHAMMAD (Kota Belud) 102. H0483653 ANUAR B AMJAD (Beaufort) 103. H0483662 FAZAL B ABD GHAFUR (Kinarut) 104. H0483665 AMIR B SAHIB (Binsulok, Papar) 105. H0483726 BASHEER B HANIFA (Likas) 106. H0483732 ALI B SAHAD GULAM (Kuala, Papar) 107. H0483782 FARMAN B HABIB (Sembulan) 108. H0483783 ABDUL BAIS B HAMDILLAH (Tuaran) 109. H0483787 AZIM B IQBAL (Likas) 110. H0483974 BINSAR B GULAM (Padas Valley, Beaufort) 111. H0483982 BARAKATHNISA BT ABDULLAH (Tuaran) 112. H0484249 EMADUDEEN B KALEED (Kinarut) 113. H0484302 PASHAMGUL B TORGUL (Likas) 114. H0484322 GHULAM B ZAFAR (Likas) 115. H0484327 LAL MOHD MAD B SAID (Klias Baru, Beaufort) 116. H0484432 PEER MOHAMAD B KADIR (Likas) 117. H0484451 HABIB B KAMASHGUL (Likas) 118. H0484597 HAZEL B FARUQ (Kimanis, Papar) 119. H0484756 BARAKATH B AHMED (Pulau Berhala, Sandakan) 120. H0484856 JAGUBAR B MOHAMED (Sandakan) 121. H0484869 ABDULLAH B SHAULHAMID (Tenghilan, Tamparuli) 122. H0484876 JUMAGULL B AMIRNAWAS (Taun Gusi, Kota Belud) 123. H0484883 JALABUDEN SAHUL (Kalumpang) 124. H0484893 RAFEEK B IBRAHIM (Salimpodon, Kudat) 125. H0484924 SIAR B HASSANGUL (Taun Gusi, Kota Belud) 126. H0484926 SULTAN B MOHD ISMAIL (Kota Belud) 127. H0484928 JAPPAR B SHEIKH MOHAMMAD (Kota Belud) 128. H0484931 HABIB B HUSSIN (Sambirai, Kota Belud) 129. H0484938 RAZ MOHAMMAD B JARULLAN (Taun Gusi, K Belud) 130. H0484942 HABIB B MOHAMMAD (Tempasuk, Kota Belud) 131. H0484944 IBRAHIM B WAZIR (Taun Gusi, Kota Belud) 132. H0484966 MOHD ROM B LAJBARHAN (Tamau, Kota Belud) 133. H0484967 MOHD PAROUK B ALI (Likas) 134. H0484971 MOHD QAMAR B GULISTAN (Taun Gusi, K Belud) 135. H0484976 ROHAN B KARAMSHAH (Beaufort) 136. H0484980 JAMSHED B NAWAR (Taun Gusi, Kota Belud) 137. H0484981 SHAMROZ B AMIRJAWAR (Beaufort) 138. H0484983 ABZAL B HASSAN (Taun Gusi, Kota Belud) 139. H0484988 KASSIM B HAZRAT ALI (Beaufort) 140. H0485152 SULTAN B SAID MOHAMAD (Jalan Labuk, Sandakan) 141. H0485154 RAHMATULLAH B AHMAD (Pulau Berhala, Sandakan) 142. H0485155 MOHD ALI B SULTAN (Batu 2, Sandakan) 143. H0485161 MATHIN B KHAN (Batu 1, Sandakan) 144. H0485165 HAMID B ZAMAN (Batu 1, Sandakan) 145. H0485167 SURAB B MUHAMAD (Sg. Kayu, Sandakan) 146. H0485169 ANUAR B MUHAMAD (Sg. Kayu, Sandakan) 147. H0485202 SAHULHAMID B MEERAN (Batu 1, Sandakan) 148. H0485204 FAIROZ B KADIR (Sibuga, Sandakan) 149. H0485212 NASAR B SEIKMYDIN (Batu 1, Sandakan) 150. H0485223 JAINULABUDIN B AMINMUSLIN (Karamunting) 151. H0485305 PACKER B MUNAF (Pulau Berhala, Sandakan) 152. H0486697 KHALAM B HAMID (Sembulan, Kota Kinabalu) 153. H0486719 HAMED B MOHAMED (Sipitang) 154. H0486746 SIRAJUDEEN MOHAMED SALLEH (Kapayan) 155. H0487027 LAL B KIMAT (Likas) 156. H0487028 AMJAD B SHAJAD (Klias Baru, Beaufort) 157. H0487085 YOUSUF B GULAM (Kota Belud) 158. H0487159 FAZAL B MOHAMMAD (Likas) 159. H0487160 FIRSYAD B POSHAD (Beaufort) 160. H0487728 MOHAMMAD B FAZAL (Kota Belud) 161. H0487730 SARDAR B MOHD RIZAL (Pasar, Sandakan) 162. H0487826 JAHABARALI B MOHD KASIM (Kota Belud) 163. H0487832 HABIB B HASTA (Cecily, Sandakan) 164. H0488001 MAMMAD KUTTI B P KADER (Tg. Kapor, Kudat) 165. H0488002 ABDUL RAHMAN ABD KADER (Salimpodon, Kudat) 166. H0488032 ABOO BACKER B MOHAMMAD (Kudat) 167. H0488036 EISSA B IBRAHEEM (Tg. Kapor, Kudat) 168. H0488153 MINHAJ B MOHAMMAD SAID (Tg. Kapor, Kudat) 169. H0488063 NASIR B MOHAMAD (Likas) 170. H0488067 AYUB B HAMID (Likas) 171. H0488069 BASEER B HAMID (Likas) 172. H0488070 GUL DATH KHAN B HAMZAH (Beaufort) 173. H0488071 HABIBULAH NUR MUHAMMAD (Kota Belud) 174. H0488074 ABDUL KHALIQUL ABDUL MALIK (Tg. Kapor, Kudat) 175. H0488076 QASIM JAN GHULAM GHAFOOR (Bongon, Ranau) 176. H0488082 AZAM B ZARDUL (Bongon, Ranau) 177. H0488088 AKBAR ALI B AMIR NAWAB (Tg. Kapor, Kudat) 178. H0488093 ALIM SHAH B AZAM SHAH (Ongkilan, Ranau) 179. H0488095 SAEEDURRAHMAN NOORULLAH (Ranau) 180. H0488105 MUMIN B ADASH (Taun Gusi, Kota Belud) 181. H0488107 JAHAN B MAHIB (Ongkilan, Ranau) 182. H0488113 BAKTHI B TALIZAR (Beaufort) 183. H0488117 HABIB B KHALID (Ongkilan, Ranau) 184. H0488121 AMIR JALAL MOHAMAD KAMAL (Tg. Kapor, Kudat) 185. H0488125 SERKHAN B AL ABBASH (Tg. Kapor, Kudat) 186. H0488149 MUZAFAR B AMIR AHMAD (Ongkilan, Ranau) 187. H0488151 FAZAL SAID B RAHMAT NOOR (Tg. Kapor, Kudat) 188. H0488037 MOHIDDEEN B ABDULLA (Tg. Kapor, Kudat) 189. H0488155 RAHIM B SAID QAMASH (Bongon, Ranau) 190. H0488156 ALBASIR B MUHAMMAD (Ongkilan, Ranau) 191. H0488158 ALI B KHALID (Kinarut) 192. H0488161 HJ SAMSUL KAMAR ZARIN KHAN (Ongkilan, Ranau) 193. H0488163 KHALID B WALID (Tg. Kapor, Kudat) 194. H0488164 ABDUL RASEED B ABDULLAH (Ongkilan, Ranau) 195. H0488166 NAJEER B SHAREEF (Ongkilan, Ranau) 196. H0488168 SAFYAN B ABU BAKAR (Ongkilan, Ranau) 197. H0488172 ABU BAKAR B SULAIMAN (Ongkilan, Ranau) 198. H0488176 SADAT B YOSOF (Ongkilan, Ranau) 199. H0488178 HAKEEM B KASIM (Bongon, Ranau) 200. H0488184 MOHAMED B ABDUL (Ongkilan, Ranau) 201. H0488217 ABDULLAH B FIRDAUS (Sulabayan, Semporna) 202. H0488218 AMBER RAHMAN (Kudat) 201. H0488225 MOHAMMED ALI B KADAR (Limbawang, Papar) 202. H0488239 MOHAMED MAIDEEN ABD KABIL (Bongon, Ranau) 203. H0488245 SHAHUL HAMEED MOHAMED YAKUB (Kawang) 204. H0488249 NASAR B BASIR (Ongkilan, Ranau) 205. H0488251 KADHAR B SALAM (Kota Belud) 206. H0488256 GULFARAZ B ABDUL HAKIM (Beaufort) 207. H0488268 AZIZ B UMARA KHAN (Ongkilan, Ranau) 208. H0488280 IQBAL B BASHIR (Beaufort) 209. H0488298 ASRAF B SAHRIF (Likas) 210. H0488627 ALNAJER B HAIL (Kapayan, Kota Kinabalu) 211. H0488672 SABER B EDARE: (Likas) 212. H0488847 MOHAMMED WAZIR MADJAD (Likas) 213. H0489110 HAMEED B JAMAL (Likas) 214. H0489136 MOHAMED IQBAL ABDUL HAMED (Likas) 215. H0489137 HABIB RAHMAN B IBRAHIM (Sipitang) 216. H0489156 ROWTHER APPA ABDUL KADER (Likas) 217. H0489202 MOHD FAROOK B IBRAHIM (Kawang, Papar) 218. H0489206 HAMEED B DAUD (Tg. Kapor, Kudat) 219. H0489209 SAFIULLAH B ZAINUDEEN (Papar) 220. H0489212 RABNAWAS B SADDAT (Beaufort) 221. H0489217 NAVAS B ABDULLAH (Kg. Air, Kota Kinabalu) 222. H0489220 SAFARUDDIN B MOIDEEN (Kota Belud) 223. H0489225 SYED B MOHAMED (Sim-Sim, Sandakan) 224. H0489228 SULAIMAN B MUSTAFFA (Kota Belud) 225. H0489231 MOHD HANEEF B ABD RAHIM (Likas) 226. H0489232 SAIK DAWOOD B MUTHALIF (Beaufort) 227. H0489239 SHEK B SAMSUDIN (Papar) 228. H0489241 MUSTHAFA B ABDULLAH (Likas) 229. H0489244 MOHD DIN B GONRAHIM (Kuhara, Tawau) 230. H0489245 MUJEBURRAHMAN B TAJUDIN (Likas) 231. H0489246 MOHD IQBAL B HAMID (Likas) 232. H0489253 MOHAMED NALER ABDUL RAHIM (Likas) 233. H0489255 ISKANDAR BACHA SYED IBRAHIM (Kota Belud) 234. H0489261 MOHAMMAD GANI SHAHULHAMID (Likas) 235. H0489262 SADIK BATCHA B BASHEER (Likas) 236. H0489273 OMAR ALI B INJAR (Tg.Aru, Kota Kinabalu) 237. H0489284 SYED AHAMED JAHABAR SHA (Likas) 238. H0489291 MOHD ISHAK B MAIDEEN (Likas) 239. H0489302 MUJEEBUR RAHMAN MUTHALIP (Likas) 240. H0489307 HAJA MAIDEEN JAMAL MOHAMED (Likas) 241. H0489309 MOHD SADIQ B ABDUL RAZAK (Likas) 242. H0489321 IBRAHIM B SALAM (Likas) 243. H0489323 SAHABUDEEN B ABDUL RAZAK (Likas) 244. H0489336 IMRAN B MIZULLAH (Berungis, Tuaran) 245. H0489346 BASHIR B MOHAMAD (Papar) 246. H0489352 JAMAL MOHD B SHAIK DAWOOD (Likas) 247. H0489359 DEEN B SHAHUL HAMEED (Papar) 248. H0489361 ABU TAHIR B MOHD SULTAN (Papar) 249. H0489366 ABDUL HALEEM B MOHD HUSSIN (Kinarut) 250. H0489371 KALEEL B BATCHA (Beaufort) 251. H0489374 SABU B RASEED (Kg. Air, Kota Kinabalu) 252. H0489376 SYED MOHD B AHMED (Berungis, Tuaran) 253. H0489377 JAWAHAR ALI B EBRAHIM (Likas) 254. H0489384 MOHAMED B KAMAL (Putatan, Petagas) 255. H0489386 ABDUL MALIK ABDUL HAMID (Likas) 256. H0489388 MOHAMED HANIF MOHIDDEN (Kg. Air, Kota Kinabalu) 257. H0489389 ABD HAMID B NAINA MOHD (Papar) 258. H0489391 RAMANDULL B MAIDULL (Putatan, Petagas) 259. H0489393 NOOR MOHAMED MOHD SHARIFF (Kawang, Papar) 260. H0489398 LATHIF B ABDULLA (Likas) 261. H0489411 AMEER ABDULLAH @ SAIFULLAH (Berungis, Tuaran) 262. H0489414 FAROOK B MOHD ALI (Papar) 263. H0489422 AJMAL B ABZAL (Kimanis, Papar) 264. H0489423 SHAHUL B MOHAMED (Papar) 265. H0489424 ALAUDEEN B SHARIF (Likas) 266. H0489426 IQBAL B RAHMAN (Beaufort)

source: sabahkini.net